Maharshi Steel Industries Vs Commissioner of Sales Tax (Orissa High Court) HC held that that the expression ‘tin containers’ is to be understood in the normal commercial and trade parlance and it would be erroneous for the Department to insist that only containers manufactured entirely out of tin should be considered to be tin containers. […]
Atlas Pvc Pipes Limited Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) It is ex facie clear from the copy of Memo of Appeal in Form GST APL-01 vide Annexure-2 series to the writ petition that having received the Order passed under Section 74 of the OGST Act on 20.01.2021, the Petitioner filed the appeal invoking […]
Held that the information that does not touch upon any of the sensitive and confidential activities undertaken by the Vigilance Department, cannot be withheld.
Provisions of section 34 restricts the scope of interference with the arbitral award on the ground of public policy. Present arbitral award doesn’t contradict public policy hence interference unjustified.
Sovakar Guru Vs State of Odisha and Ors. (Orissa High Court) The grievance of the Petitioner, insofar as payment of arrears is concerned, has already been redressed but the interest component of the amount which has been held up for the last twenty-one years, is required to be paid. There is no dispute about the […]
Dulamani Patel Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) The Petitioner’s prayer insofar as promoting and repositioning him in the school where he was continuing or at a nearby place, is unsustainable as the Petitioner was holding a transferable post and under the conditions of service applicable to him, he was liable to be transferred […]
Ugrasen Sahu Vs State of Odisha (Orissa High Court) In a State of Uttaranchal & Ors. Vs. Pitamber Dutt Semwal, the relief was denied to the Government employee on the ground that he sought correction in the service record after nearly 30 years of service. While setting aside the judgment of the High Court, the […]
That the petitioner as a transgender has every right to choose her gender and accordingly, she has submitted her application for grant of family pension under Section 56(1) of Odisha Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1992.
It was clear, therefore, that till such time the purchase order was issued pursuant to such acceptance of the offer made by the Petitioner, there was no completed ‘contract’. Consequently, Clause-6.34.1 would not get attracted.
JSW Steel Ltd. Vs Union of India (Orissa High Court) In view of definition of “Input Service Distributor” contained in Section 2(61), it is necessary that the ISD as an office is required to receive tax invoices towards inward supply. Facts- The Petitioner, being engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of hot and […]
