Bhagwati Agency Vs Assistant Commissioner, GST & Central Excise (Orissa High Court) 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. Heard Mr. Sidhhartha Ray, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. S.K. Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. We have also heard Mr. A. Kedia, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the […]
PCIT (Exemption) Vs Bishandayal Jewellers (Orissa High Court) Before the CIT(A), the Assessee claimed that the Assessing Officer (AO) had not given copies of the seized materials extracted from the hard disk and the pen drive. The CIT( A) called for a remand report from the AO. By the time, the remand report could be […]
There is no dispute through Annexure-1 that the earlier assessment assessing the Petitioner’s building by the Sambalpur Municipal Corporation as it was then operating raising the holding tax to Rs. 1,19,858/- and the proposal for further assessment is only made by way of notice dated 22.2.2023 enhancing the holding tax from Rs.1,19,858/- to Rs. 3,12,609/- per annum.
Galaxy Bar and Restaurant Vs State of Odisha and others (Orissa High Court) Aggrieved by the non-grant of a licence for an IMFL Restaurant ON Shop under the name and style as ‘Galaxy Bar and Restaurant at Nayagarh’, the Petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the Opposite Parties to process […]
CIT (Exemptions) Vs Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (Orissa High Court) On 12th January 2022, the CIT (E) issued a show cause notice (SCN) to the Assessee under Section 263 of the Act stating that a sum of Rs.1,11,54,33,001/- collected as development fees from its students had been directly carried to the balance sheet under […]
HC held that it was incumbent on the CT and GST Officer to accept the payment of tax by using electronic credit ledger (ECL).
Any payment towards output tax, whether self-assessed in the return or payable as a consequence of any proceeding instituted under the provisions of GST Laws, can be made by utilization of the amount available in the electronic credit ledger of a registered person
After lapse of 10 years second impugned notice dated 30th October, 2017 was issued to the Petitioner asking him to appear for hearing. The Petitioner filed an application dated 9th November, 2017 before the authority expressing its inability to collect documents after such a long lapse of time.
It was wrongly noted that the Assessee has not filed any return of income, when in fact Assessee had filed its return. It was further wrongly noted that the Assessee has not preferred appeal against the assessment order when in fact the Petitioner had filed the aforementioned appeal.
Sri Laxmi Narayan Agency Vs ITO (Orissa High Court) On writ the assessee contended that the documents on the basis of which the Assessing Officer had formed the reason to believe that income had escaped assessment were not supplied to the assessee, and that the request for opportunity of cross-examination of the persons on the […]
