Notification dated 24.03.2020 does not save the Applicant/ Corporate Debtor from the initiation of insolvency especially in cases where defaults towards creditors have taken place before the COVID pandemic and the resultant financial crisis. Such an interpretation would be contrary to the intention of the executive in exercise of its power of delegated legislation. If the intention was to provide for a blanket protection to Corporate Debtors from being dragged to the NCLT irrespective of when or what extent a default has taken place, it would necessarily require a legislative amendment, and that a mere issuance of the notification would not suffice.
From the report there does not appear any request of the Resolution Professional for issuance of the instructions for the purpose of conducting negotiations between the debtor and creditors for arriving at the repayment plan. Therefore, based on the reasons recorded in the report submitted by the Resolution Professional
M/s. Neesa Infrastructure Limited vs State Bank of India (NCLT) Advocate, Mr. Nipun Singhvi appeared on behalf of the Respondent. The order is pronounced in the open court, vide separate sheet. 1. Sanjay Gupta, claiming himself to be the authorised signatory, on behalf of M/s. Neesa Infrastructure Limited filed this Petition under Section 10 of […]
whether the liability of a guarantor of a debt of a corporate debtor stands reduced/extinguished upon an Insolvency Resolution Plan in respect of the corporate debtor, being approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016?”
M/s Fincast Founders and Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Shri Rajat Mukherjee (NCLAT Ahemdabad) 1) The instant application is filed under section 60 (5) of the IB Code r.w. Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 seeking appropriate direction in Resolution Plan dated 25.05.2019, with following prayer: a. to enable the applicant to comply with the […]
Indus Biotech Private Limited Vs Kotak India Venture Fund-I (National Company Law Tribunal) FACTUAL BACKGROUND In the present case, the Indus Biotech Pvt. Ltd. (Corporate Debtor) has filed a Interlocutory application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act, 1996) where in the underlying Insolvency petition was filed under Section 7 […]
The Tribunal held that in the absence of any power of recall or review being available to the Tribunal, the present case at hand does not fall within the confines of Section 420 of the Companies Act, 2013 nor Rule 11 of the NCALT Rules, 2016. As recourse, the Applicant should have approached the Appellate Tribunal under Section 61 of the Code.
Whether increase in threshold by CG through notification for initiating CIRP is prospective or retrospective in effect?
NCLT directs the GST Department to (a) To restore the e-way facility for filing of the GST returns in respect of Corporate Debtors all Companies including Techno Electronics Limited currently under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Proceedings.
T. R. Ravichandran, RP Vs The Asst. Commissioner (ST) (NCLT) As to provisions of GST Act, since Section 238 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code having categorically mentioned that IBC will have over riding effect on all other laws which are in contravention to the provisions of the IBC, RI cannot raise an objection saying […]
