Sponsored
    Follow Us:

ITAT Mumbai

Businessman is best judge to decide its commercial expediency

July 23, 2015 607 Views 0 comment Print

In the present facts of the Case, the Hon’ble tribunal held that businessman is the best Judge to find out what is the best for his business and to whom he should employ as the Commercial Expediency is only known to him.

Entries write back in absence of explanation is assessable as income

July 23, 2015 4795 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal examined that whether addition can be made on account of net increase in the assessee’s capital during the year on account of write back as well as write off of some old credits and debits appearing in her accounts.

No deduction u/s 54 is allowed where assessee has constructed a house prior to the date of transfer of original house

July 21, 2015 2040 Views 0 comment Print

ACIT Vs. Sagar Nitin Parikh (ITAT Mumbai) In the instant case, the assessee has constructed a house prior to the date of transfer of original house, in which case, the assessee is not entitled to claim deduction u/s 54 of the Act in respect of the cost of new flat.

No addition can be made u/s 2(22)(e) when assessee is not a shareholder

July 13, 2015 641 Views 0 comment Print

The dividend can be received or deemed to have been received only by shareholder of the company, therefore, the provisions of section 2(22)(e) enlarging the scope of dividend under the express deemed dividend cannot be invoked in case of a person who is not a shareholder of the company who has advance the loan.

Loss in pension fund has to excluded from insurance business income

July 13, 2015 759 Views 0 comment Print

Tribunal in this above case decided two debatable issues. Firstly that the mistake can be rectified after assessment attained finality and assessee had accepted the assessment order. The same is decided by the tribunal in the light of decision of apex court.

Exemption u/s 11 cannot be denied on giving interest free loan and renting of property

July 3, 2015 6891 Views 0 comment Print

Interest free loan given by the assessee society to another society with identical object cannot be treated as investment or deposit in which event there is no violation of section 13(1)(d) row’s. 11(5) of the Act.

Application of provision of section 14A r.w. Rule 8D without recording satisfaction cannot be upheld

July 3, 2015 968 Views 0 comment Print

It is a trite law as per provision of section and various judicial pronouncement that AO must record satisfaction regarding to non-correctness of the claim of the assessee u/s 14 A. He must ensure that there is an error in calculation of expenditure relating to the income which relates to the exempted income.

Mere Entries found in third party books are not binding on Assessee

July 1, 2015 4037 Views 0 comment Print

Entries found in third party books are not binding on the assessee solely on the basis of information received from the investigation unless the statement of the third party was supported by any documentary evidence.

Statement U/s. 132(4) without any supporting material does not have any evidentiary value

June 30, 2015 1464 Views 0 comment Print

The sole basis of the Department to assess profit of Rs.70.00 lacs is based upon the statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act. It is a matter of fact that by the time statement was recorded, the entire project was not sold by the assessee. Only two shops were sold.

Some important aspects of allowability of business claim and concealment of penalty

June 30, 2015 432 Views 0 comment Print

Investments are made in Govt. securities, debentures, bonds having fixed rate of return. Assessee is maintaining books of account on mercantile system i.e, on accrual basis. Whether Payment of Interest accrues on day to day basis? Referring to the decision of tribunal, high-court and Supreme Court in various cases sighted

Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031