The issue under consideration is whether the petitioner firm had correctly accounted for the deposits made in its account during demonetization?
Muhammed Kochukudiyil Ishabeevi Alias Isha Shaefi Proprietress Nadiya Timbers Vs State Tax Officer (Intelligence) (Kerala High Court) Contention of the petitioner that she should be exempted from the requirement of paying interest and penalty while availing the option of payment of tax for the purposes of avoiding the show cause notice cannot be accepted. The […]
The issue under consideration is whether the best judgement assessment can be set aside by filing revised return beyond specified time period?
CIAL Duty Free And Retail Services Ltd (CDRSL) Vs. Union of India (Kerala High Court) Kerala High Court held that petitioner shall pay the GST on input services including Concession Fee and claim ITC of the entire tax amount and thereafter claim refund of the same by following the procedure prescribed under Section 54(3) of […]
Hon’ble Kerala High Court has held that bank guarantee shall not be encashed till such time where assessee preferred appeal against the detention order before the Appellate authority.
It is the case of the petitioner that the transportation was of a consignment of watches that had been supplied to him by the seller in Delhi at a discounted rate of Rs.8.99. It is seen that the transportation of the goods was accompanied by Ext.P4 tax invoice, where the supplier in Delhi had shown the actual price of the consignment of watches, which was Rs.4,49,550/- and had given a discount of almost the entire amount save to the extent of Rs.8.99, and had paid IGST at the rate of 18% on the actual value of the watches.
Sulochana Gupta Vs RBG Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. (Kerala High Court) Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, can be for the enforcement of fundamental rights or for any other purpose, as envisaged under Article 226 of the Constitution. There is no pleadings or materials to substantiate that the appellants are discharging […]
The issue under consideration is whether revised amount can be taken as the quantified amount to test the eligibility for Sabka Vikas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 (SVLDR)?
Rajive And Company Vs. Assistant Commissioner Special Circle (Kerala High Court) Petitioners will no doubt be entitled to seek copies of the documents seized from their premises, if and when they are confronted by the respondents with any notice or other proceeding, wherein reliance is placed on the said seized documents. I, therefore, make it […]
The issue under consideration is whether detention of goods merely because the consignee is mentioned as an unregistered person in the e-way bill is justified in law?
