Jharkhand High Court held that once registration has been granted under section 12AA after satisfying about genuineness of the activities of the Trust, the same cannot be cancelled on the basis of the same set of provisions of the Trust.
RSB Transmissions India Limited Vs Union of India (Jharkhand High Court) A combined reading of Section 49(1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Rule 87 (6) and (7) of CGST Rules, 2017 both go to show that such deposit does not mean that the amount is appropriated towards the Government exchequer. On other hand other, a […]
Mahalaxmi Infra Contract Ltd. Vs Goods and Services Tax Council (Jharkhand High Court) In the instant case it appears that on account of an inadvertent error, the entry relating to Tax Invoice No. 01/2018- 19 dated 17th January 2019 could not be reflected in the GSTR-1 filed by the petitioner against the GSTIN of Eastern […]
Jharkhand High Court held that acceptance of bribe duly proved and accordingly, a punishment of six months simple imprisonment under Section 7 of the PC Act and one year’s simple imprisonment under Section 13 (2) r/w 13 (1) (d) of the P.C. Act with a fine of Rs.1000 sentenced for accepting bribe for furnishing Income Tax clearance certificate
Petitioner is a Chartered Accountant by profession and after passing the examination, he became eligible to be appointed as an Insolvency Professional by the Committee of Creditors under Section 3(19) of IBC, 2016 for handling the companies under liquidation.
Liability of a partner for acts of the firm. Every partner is liable, jointly with all the other partners and also severally, for all acts of the firm done while he is a partner.
Demand notice issued by the tax authorities to a Senior Advocate seeking payment of service tax on legal services provided by him to a legal firm was set aside as Notification No.30/2012-ST dated 20.06.2012 had been amended by way of substitution by virtue of two consecutive notifications, i.e., Notification No. 18/2016-ST dated 01.03.2016 and Notification No.34/2016-ST dated 06.06.2016
Merely GST refund claim on the basis of averments not suffice unless & until the said claim assesse is corroborated by documentary evidence.
Held that in absence of proper show cause notice u/s. 73 (1) of the JGST Act and proper opportunity of hearing, issuance of the bank attachment notice contained in GST DRC-13 u/s. 79(1)(c) is untenable in law
HC held that merely because one party, has approached before MSME Council, Arbitration application cannot be held to be not maintainable
