Explore how ITAT Kolkata ruling on Britannia Industries Ltd. CSR contributions clarifies tax deductions under Section 80G.
Learn how Enayetpur S K U S Ltd secured Section 80P(2)(i) benefits for providing credit facilities for non-agricultural purposes to members according to ITAT Kolkata’s ruling.
Learn about the ruling by ITAT Kolkata stating no deduction can be claimed if employees’ contributions deducted from salaries were not paid to PF & ESI accounts. Full order analysis provided.
Read the full text of the ITAT Kolkata’s order in the case of Maa Biddeswari Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO. Learn how the ITAT ruled to delete the addition of share premium due to the AO’s flawed valuation.
Analysis of Satbir Mahato Vs PCIT case by Kolkata ITAT, highlighting the dispute over Section 263 jurisdiction due to plausible views of AO.
In the Nano Infra Promoters Pvt Ltd vs ITO case at ITAT Kolkata, learn why receipts couldn’t be added to income under section 68 just for summons non-compliance.
Read the full text of ITAT Kolkata’s order in Kanchan Vanijya Pvt Ltd Vs ACIT case, where the assessment order was quashed due to violation of principles of natural justice.
ITAT Kolkata scrutinized the provisions of section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and observed that the AO had not considered the stamp duty valuation of the property on the date of agreement, which was in 2015. As per the proviso to the section, the stamp duty value on the date of agreement should have been taken into account.
Read about the ITAT Kolkata’s decision to uphold the addition of share capital and premium under Section 68 for Invorex Trading Pvt. Ltd. vs ITO. Get insights into the case and its implications.
In DCIT Vs Eko Diagnostic Pvt. Ltd., ITAT Kolkata rules that Section 2(22) of Income Tax Act doesn’t apply to non-beneficiary shareholders in loan-receiving companies.