Learn about the ITAT Kolkata ruling where employer’s PF contribution disallowance under Sec 36(1)(va) was upheld. Full text of the order included.
Read the full text of the ITAT Kolkata order on Bisakha Sales Pvt. Ltd. Vs CIT, covering assessment year 2008-09. Explore the appeal, arguments, and conclusions in this detailed analysis.
Explore the detailed analysis of ITO Vs Axisline Investment Consultants Pvt. Ltd. case where ITAT Kolkata deleted Rs. 1.54 crore addition for share capital under Section 68.
ITAT Kolkata held in ITO Vs Happy Structure Pvt. Ltd. that share application amount cannot be added twice under Section 68 of Income Tax Act in in payees & recipients’ hands u/s 68
Satyam Smertex pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata): Addition made by AO and confirmed by CIT(A) are based on conjectures and surmises, so their impugned action cannot be justified.
Discover the ITAT Kolkata ruling on Surendra Steels vs DCIT, addressing the disallowance of 80IC deduction due to procedural issues and audit report delays.
Assessee has placed sufficient documents and materials on record to prove identity and creditworthiness of shareholders and genuineness of transaction of receiving share capital and share premium, invoking provisions of Section 68 of was not justified
Where it has been sufficiently established that share applicants had substantial creditworthiness and investments had been made by assessee’s own sister concern/group companies having mostly common directors and thus, establishing creditworthiness and genuinity of investments, additions under section 68 had been rightly been deleted.
Once source of funds is taxed in the hands of share applicant companies, it cannot be added as unexplained income in the hands of assessee company.
Explore the full text and detailed analysis of Shah Tracom Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO case from ITAT Kolkata. Understand the implications, legal arguments, and outcomes in tax assessment disputes.
