Gujarat HC directed department to grant refund of IGST already paid by the assessee on the amount of ocean freight charges.
Vendor shall not be deemed to have committed any offence. If he has purchased the article of food in any other status from any manufacturer, distributor or dealer with written warranty in the prescribed form
Public Provident Fund account shall not be liable to any attachment in respect of any debt or liability incurred by the account holder.
Applicant has disputed the age of ink utilized for signature of applicant on cheque and prayed for comparison of the ink used for text on the body of the cheque, alleging that endorsement was not in full on instrument.
Dharmesh Kirtikumar Saha Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Facts: Applicant has entered into a criminal conspiracy for creating fake purchases of 2 (two) firms with well organize bogus billing syndicate which resulted into monetary loss of the government exchequer to the turn of Rs 9.33 crores. Applicant was served summon, however he didn’t not […]
It was submitted by appellant that as per the provisions of Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) the record of the deceased petitioner, which has been illegally destroyed, appropriate penalty may be imposed upon the respondent.
The assessee gave additional discount to parties on account of godown rent paid by the said parties. According to the assessee, the customers did not take the delivery of the goods in their own godown after the purchase and the goods would continue to be at the godown of the assessee till the customer sells the goods to the other parties.
Yamuna Cables Accessories Pvt. Ltd. Vs Desai Enterprise (Gujarat High Court) Learned advocate Mr. S. P. Majmudar appeared for the petitioner and learned senior advocate Mr. B. S. Patel with learned advocate Mr. Umang Oza appeared for the respondents. 2. By way of the present petition, the petitioner has invoked the jurisdiction of this Court […]
The F.I.R. states the number of Santro car. Merely one of the witnesses has said that he has given the deposition by signing the document without reading and he was not much aware about which car has caused the accident, is not that much fatal.
State cannot claim preference over the subject property for the purpose of recovery of the dues towards tax. It is not in dispute that the first charge was created in favour of the bank and the bank in exercise of its powers under the SARFAESI Act, put the subject property to auction.
