Gauhati High Court stays GST Show Cause Notice against Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Form GST ASMT-10 not issued, challenging compliance of statutory rules.
Gauhati HC to rule on the validity of CGST Section 73 SCN when an order under 65(6) is already issued. Stay informed about this crucial tax jurisdiction case.”
Discover how Gauhati High Court’s ruling on delayed assessment order notification affects their validity. Explore case of Vishal Udyog vs. State of Assam.
In the case of Net Metallics vs. Union of India, the CESTAT rules on pre-deposit requirements where the Order-in-Original (OIO) is set aside without confirming a demand.
Gauhati High Court held that Petitioner would be entitled to reimbursement of GST on differential amount of price variation of steel and GST paid by the Petitioner from the electronic credit ledger has to be taken into consideration while computing the Price Variation Clause (PVC) Claims of the Petitioner.
Gauhati High Court held that the existence of an alternative relief would dissuade the Court from entertaining the writ petition. Constitutional Jurisdiction cannot be exercised in view of provisions for alternative remedy.
Gauhati High Court held that writ petition not entertained as alternative and efficacious remedy is available to the petitioner. Accordingly, tax payer directed to avail statutory remedy, which is more efficacious.
Gauhati High Court in case of recovery of royalty stayed the recovery by stating that as an ad-interim measure no coercive action shall be initiated against the petitioner for recovery of amount till the next returnable date.
Gauhati High Court ruling in Malay Mukharjee Vs State of Assam, where bail was granted to accused involved in transportation of cough syrup without proper E-way Bill
High Court of Gauhati, after examining detailed submissions, directs DGGI to produce original records in the court for inspection of the court to ascertain whether there was ‘reason to believe’ or was it a mere pretence.
