Guwahati High Court rules against parallel proceedings for the same period under CGST and SGST Acts, emphasizing legal clarity. Read the full analysis.
Court highlighted that the mere existence of an alternative statutory remedy does not ipso facto render a writ petition non-maintainable. It underscored exceptions where writ jurisdiction could be invoked despite the availability of alternative remedies, notably when there is a violation of fundamental rights, principles of natural justice, jurisdictional errors, or when challenging the vires of an Act.
Gauhati High Court grants interim stay on show cause notice seeking ITC reversal for Surya Business Pvt Ltd, citing valid tax invoices and payments made to supplier.
Dibyajit Bora’s dispute with Union of India over demand notice for service tax. Gauhati High Court directs supply of certified copy. Analysis and implications discussed.
Learn from Sanjoy Nath Vs Union of India case: Guwahati High Court directs GST registration restoration if returns filed with taxes, interest, and penalty.
Gauhati High Court held that industrial units which was not required to be registered under the Central Excise Act, either due to low threshold limit or as manufacturing goods that were exempted, cannot be denied benefit of budgetary support scheme.
Gauhati High Court stays GST Show Cause Notice against Pepsico India Holdings Pvt. Ltd. Form GST ASMT-10 not issued, challenging compliance of statutory rules.
Gauhati HC to rule on the validity of CGST Section 73 SCN when an order under 65(6) is already issued. Stay informed about this crucial tax jurisdiction case.”
Discover how Gauhati High Court’s ruling on delayed assessment order notification affects their validity. Explore case of Vishal Udyog vs. State of Assam.
In the case of Net Metallics vs. Union of India, the CESTAT rules on pre-deposit requirements where the Order-in-Original (OIO) is set aside without confirming a demand.
