Md. Abul Kalam Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) It is trite, though of great significance that if any oral argument is advanced, only the Judge who had heard can appreciate the nuances of the case, the evidence adduced, based on oral arguments submitted by the parties or through the counsel. Naturally if hearing […]
Union of India and 4 Ors. Vs Keshari Industries (Gauhati High Court) Order passed following the Supreme Court decision cannot be termed as erroneous simply because subsequently the said decision of the Supreme Court is held to be per incurium by a larger bench FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF GAUHATI HIGH COURT All these […]
Ahinsha Chemicals Ltd Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) In the instant case, it is the case of the petitioner that the requirement of requesting for fixation of a special rate in respect of the value addition to the manufactured goods had arisen only after the final judgment of the Supreme Court on 22.04.2020, […]
Vikas Bansal Vs UOI (Gauhati High Court) It is found that in his statement, recorded under Section 70 of the CGST Act, the petitioner has subscribed to the statement of aforesaid Amit Kumar made before the Senior Intelligence Officer of the CGST. It has also come out from his statement that whatever coal he had […]
Petitioner is found to have deliberately supplied goods without issuing invoices in violation of the provisions of AGST Act with intention to evade Tax during the period of 2019 to 2021.
The writ petition filed by the tax Bar Association before the Gauhati High Court seeking a direction from the respondent authorities to restore the old income tax portal immediately due to non functioning to the new income tax portal system (Income Tax Portal 2.0) inasmuch as the genuine tax payer who are interested in paying due taxes and submit the returns are not being able to pay the taxes and submit returns and other forms.
BMG Informatics Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India (Gauhati High Court) In an important decision given by Justice A.M Bujor Barua of the Gauhati High Court in the case of W.P (C) 3880/2021 3878/2021 3675/2021 4120/2021 (BMG Informatics Pvt. Ltd. vs. Union of India) the Court as held that the circular no. CBEC-20/01/06/2019-GST dated 31.03.2020 […]
The Petitioner was alleged of unjustly availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) on fake invoices and E-way bills alongside Mr. Amit Kumar (Co-accused). While seeking bail, the Petitioner contended that he has been in custody for a month, as on date, with effect from July 19, 2021 and therefore, his further custodial detention is absolutely not necessary in the interest of investigation of the case.
The contention of the Revenue is that Section 11 BB of the Central Excise Act would not be applicable in the present case as it is a delayed refund of certain exemptions and will not be covered by Section 11 BB of the Act
Explore the denial of bail for Amit Kumar in a GST evasion case. Gauhati High Court cites the magnitude of economic offenses and potential tampering of evidence.
