In the present complaint, Opposite Parties have tampered with original MRP Price of oil sachet and charged extra amount more than MRP.
Held that there is no infringement of copyright as some contents are bound to be similar as teaching given in the Holy Books Quran and Hadees and other religious text related to Islam religion are bound to be same in all books which are about teaching on Islam.
It is not the matter of mere initiation of refund under the CGST Act only, rather now it appears to have become an offence punishable under Sections 420/467/468/471 of IPC wherein the maximum punishment prescribed is imprisonment for life.
The ICAI under Chairmanship of G. Soma Shekher sent representative to ascertain the facts from India TV News Channel and upon finding material of paper leak, lodged the present FIR. Investigation was carried out and considering the gravity of the same, investigation was taken up by the Crime Branch department.
It is also alleged that the accused persons failed to cooperate and provide any assistance even to the statutory and forensic auditors of the Corporate Debtor during Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process.
Hetram Vs DGGI (Gurugram Court) This is the application for hail filed by applicant-accused Hetram in criminal complaint under section 132(1)(h) & (c) of GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter called the Act). 2. It is submitted by learned counsel for applicant that the applicant is Director of M/s Rajnandini Metal Ltd. thereinafter referred as M/s Rajnandini) […]
The applicant in spite of being a Tax consultant, he has deliberately indulged in the issuance of fake invoices to pass the illegal Input Tax Credit to the endusers and thus defrauded the Govt. Exchequer from its huge legitimate GST revenue.
Directorate of Enforcement Vs Mohammed Nawab Mohammed Islam Malik @ Nawab Malik (PMLA Cousrt at Bombay) As per section 3, the offence of money laundering is continuing in nature and it continues till such time a person enjoying the proceeds of crime by its concealment or possession or acquisition or use of untainted property or […]
Mukund Dattatray Kurne Vs State of Gujarat (Civil & Session Court Ahmedabad) The ld advocate argued that applicant is a Chartered Accountant and he had appointed as C.A and he had audited account for the year 2014-15 and 2015-2016. He has argued that this applicant is not a director and contended that the role of […]
GST Vs Krishna Kant Pandey, Laxmi Kant Pandey & Shashi Kant Pandey (Patiala House Court) The present case is of clandestine manufacturing and sale which is covered by Section 132 (1) (a). Although, the punishment and the status of the case has cognizable and non bailable is the same, the evidence of both category of […]
