ITAT upheld the decision of the Commissioner, who had correctly deleted the addition made by the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer had added the differential margin to the assessee’s income based solely on a comparison between industry gross margin and the assessee’s gross margin, without conducting a thorough analysis of the assessee’s business strategy.
ITAT Delhi held that registration u/s 12AA to trust created for managing the statutory obligations of employees of the parent trust is granted as the same falls within the ambit of advancement of general public utility and, hence, to be considered as a charitable activity as defined u/s 2(15) of the Act.
ITAT Delhi held that assessee being a local authority is not engaged in business or earning profit, accordingly, penalty u/s 271B for not getting accounts audited unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi ruling in Maral Overseas Ltd Vs DCIT, asserting that Education cess is non-deductible as an expenditure under Sections 37 and 40(a)(ii) of Income Tax Act.
ITAT Delhi held that the deduction u/s 36(1)(va) of the Income Tax Act can be allowed only if the employees’ share in the relevant funds is deposited by the employer before the due date stipulated in respective Acts.
ITAT Delhi has ordered a fresh adjudication in the case of TSP Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, challenging the addition of a loan amount to the outstanding balance without proper evidence and documentation.
ITAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act unsustainable as reasonable cause shown for non-submission of audit report.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, in the case of Raj Kumar Vs ACIT, held that a S. 69 addition is not sustainable based on a mere delay in deposit during the demonetisation period.
ITAT Delhi held that penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act not leviable as assessee is a local authority and it cannot be considered to be one engaged in ‘business’ or to be earning profit.
ITAT Delhi dismisses Drishti Apparels’ appeal against disallowance of PF and ESI deduction due to delayed deposit, aligning with Supreme Court decision.
