Pradeep Jain Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) In the present case, it is noticed that the AO issued notices u/s 148 and 142(1) of the Act at the address D-60, Noida Authority, Sector-108, Noida. However, the assessment was framed by mentioning the address of the assessee as P-3, Shop No. LGF 20, Krishna Apra Plaza, Sector-18, […]
M/s. Sucon India Ltd Vs JCIT (ITAT Delhi) Loss suffered by assessee on derivative transaction is not speculative loss and as such eligible to be adjusted against business income and Explanation 73 of the Income Tax Act is not attracted. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT Appellant, M/s. Sucon India Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as […]
Honda Motor Co. Ltd. Case: Where Reassessment Is Based Only On Allegation That Appellant Has PE In India, Notice Under Section 148 Cannot Sustain Once Arm’s Length Price Procedure Has Been Followed.
ITAT, Delhi held that the subsidy received by the assessee from the subsidy received under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme of 2004 was capital in nature and could not be taxed as revenue receipts.
New Horizon Logiware (P) LTD Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) AO has discussed the facts in detail and the relevant clauses of the lease deed and also mentioned that the said warehouse was already rented to present tenant (Tupperware) by earlier owner from whom assessee has purchased this building in this year. As per AO, the […]
Shri Jinendra Kumar Jain Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) It is, therefore, clear from the evidence on record that assessee in fact, has let-out the joint property to the tenant company and has received advance as well as security deposit of the aforesaid amounts. The authorities below rejected the claim of assessee because the amount of […]
Jawala Cooperative Urban Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Funds kept in bank could be said to be ready for utilization by the assessee, cooperative society, in its business of providing credit facilities to its members, and therefore, the income from such monies, kept in bank, were attributable to the business of […]
Issuance of notice under section 153C is mandatory and a condition precedent for taking action against assessee under section 153C, therefore, assessment order under section 153C issued without issuing a notice under section 153C was bad in law.
Shri Gurinder Singh Dhillon Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessee filed the appeal before the ld. CIT (A) manually within time as per the old provisions. Later on, the manner of furnishing the appeal in Form No.35 before the ld. CIT (A) was amended vide Notification No. 5/2016 dated 06.04.2016 and the procedure was laid down. […]
Since no assessment was pending on the date of search and addition had been made on basis of post-search enquiries and statements recorded under section 132(4) on various persons, therefore, AO had no power to assume jurisdiction under provisions of section 153A as no incriminating material was found.
