Global Healthline Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The first issue relates to disallowance of sum of Rs.20,83,340/- on account of credit card commission under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. It is the case of the assessee that provisions of Section 194H are not attracted having regard to nature of such expenses. It is contended […]
Expenses have been disallowed on estimate basis. The basis of such disallowances is said to be incompleteness of the bills and vouchers. However, the Assessing Officer has not pointed out as to which bills and vouchers were found to be wanting.
Interglobe Entreprises Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) A combined reading of Section 199(3) r.w. Rule 37BA(3) makes the position of law clear that credit for TDS is available in the year in which the income is reported and as a corollary, should not be deferred to some other assessment year. In the instant case, […]
Harish Aswal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee has submitted all documentary evidences before the authorities below including ledger account of Centurian Bank Account No.442756061 available at page 108 to 138 of assessee’s Paper Book before the AO as well as before Ld.CIT(A) which clearly shows that the […]
ACIT Vs Vserve Business Solution Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Assessing Officer has not disputed the fact that the assessee is not a share holder in Intersoft Data Labs Labs Pvt. Ltd. which provided interest free loans to the assessee only because the assessee as well as lender entity are having a common shareholder the Assessing […]
Plaza Cable Industries Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The maintainability of jurisdiction under Section 147 of the Act is central to the controversy in the instant case. On perusal of the reasons recorded under Section 148(2) of the Act qua the alleged escapement as reproduced in paragraph 6 above, it is straightaway noticed that the […]
income from technical handling is exempt from taxation in India as the same is covered under Article 8 of the DTAA between India & Netherlands and hence not liable to tax in India.
Assessment framed by the AO is on other issues which is not part of the reasons recorded for reopening the assessment. In such a situation, the assessment order is not sustainable in the eye of law.
Krishan Kumar Goel Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) AO has made additions and computed the income at Rs.1,88,85,961/-. Nowhere in the order of the AO there is any whisper that AO is not satisfied by the compliance by the assessee to his notices or queries. Now, the same AO has passed the above said penalty order. […]
DCIT Vs Jammu Pigments Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) Assessing Officer initiated proceeding under section 154 of the Act to make the disputed disallowance while computing the book profit and ultimately did so. Therefore, it is evident, the 154 proceeding was at the behest of the Revenue audit. Applicability of section 14A read with Rule 8D to […]
