ITAT Delhi held that expenses paid to legal and professionals for an opinion about legal and tax consequences of the prospective investment cannot be considered to be a capital expenditure. Such expenses are revenue in nature.
Karam Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Assessing Officer made the addition alleging that the assessee did not furnish the required information to prove the loan transaction. However, it is observed, before the first appellate authority, the assessee produced additional evidences, such as, the bank statements of lenders, copy of Income Tax Return etc. to prove […]
ITAT Delhi held that initiation of reassessment proceedings without applying his mind based only on the sole reason that as per AIR information assessee has deposited cash in his savings bank is without authority of law.
ITAT held that Once cash flow statement is not controverted by the Assessing Officer as well as the ld. CIT[A], the addition of such cash deposit is not valid
The ITAT by relying upon the Judgment of co-ordinate Bench, wherein co-ordinate Bench followed the Judgment of Jurisdictional High Court have observed that 15% of the revenue relating to bookings made from India being attributable to the taxpayers PE in India after considering the nature and extent of activities in India and abroad and assets employed & risk assumed.
ITAT Delhi held that addition of unexplained investment under section 69 of the Income Tax Act merely on the basis of loose sheet alone without any other corroborative evidence is unsustainable in law.
G-Trans Logistics (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) dismissed the appeal just on the ground that in Form No.35, the section of assessment order mentioned is 144 instead of 143(3). In his opinion of Ld. CIT(A) this is an incurable defect. Ld. CIT(A) has not specified under which law, it is […]
ITAT Delhi held that ESOP expenditure to acquire shares of parent company is allowable as and when the expenditure is paid by the assessee to the parent company. Actual payment of the expenditure and time of expenditure needs to be verified
ITAT Delhi held that there is no liability to deduct TDS on interest on savings bank account and interest of compulsory deposit account as per the provisions contained u/s 194A of the Act. Accordingly, disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) unsustainable.
ITAT Delhi held that reasons recorded for reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act doesnt disclose that income has escaped assessment due to failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all the material facts and hence assessment order passed thereon are quashed.
