PCIT Vs Superior Films Private Limited (Delhi High Court) When the assessee has filed a return u/s 139 of the Act or in response to sections 142(1) or 148 of the I.T.Act and when an assessment order u/s 143(3) or u /s 147 of the Act has already been passed then the assessee enjoys statutory […]
Delhi HC imposes cost on Audit-I & GST EAST for non-appearance. Anand and Anand vs Union of India. Latest legal updates by Anand Bhattacharya
Federation of Indian Small Scale Battery Associations (Regd.) and Anr. Vs Union of India and ORS. (Delhi High Court) Here the main question to answer by the court is whether it can be permitted to deny ITC to recipient for the fault of supplier? Via this petition, challenge has been laid to the constitutional vires […]
The Hon’ble High Court, Delhi directed that proceedings pursuant to the SCN and Impugned summons shall continue but the final orders shall not be given effect to till disposal of the writ petition. Listed the case on August 9, 2020 for next hearing.
Delhi HC sets aside ITAT order due to non-publication of daily sheets causing prejudice. Directs ITAT to implement system for online updates within 3 months.
RMSI Private Ltd. Vs National E-Assessment Centre (Delhi High Court) It is mandatory for the National E-Assessment Centre to provide an opportunity to the assessee, by serving a notice calling upon him to show cause as to why the variation proposed in the Draft Assessment Order, which is prejudicial to the interest of the assessee, […]
Toplight Corporate Management (P.) Ltd. Vs National faceless assessment Centre Delhi (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the impugned assessment order was passed without issuing mandatory draft assessment order along with show cause notice, as contemplated under Section 144B of the Act, resulting in denial of opportunity to the petitioner to […]
R. J. Trading Co. Vs Commissioner of CGST, Delhi North & Ors. (Delhi High Court) Search and Seizure carried out by the Inspector of CGST without authority of a proper jurisdictional officer is unlawful – Delhi High Court In case of R J Trading Company vs. Commissioner of CGST, Delhi (W.P.(C).4847/2021 it is held that […]
CBI to enquire as to whether the email dated 31st May, 2021 had been issued to assessee or not, and if so, by whom. In the event it was found that the email dated 31st May, 2021 had been forged and fabricated by assessee it would initiate action under Sections 191/192/196 of the IPC. However, if it was found that the email dated 31st May, 2021 had been issued by the Income Tax of India’s e-filing portal, then it would not hesitate to take action against the Deponent
M/s. Ajanta Industries Vs Commissioner of Central Goods and Services Tax and Anr. (Delhi High Court) It is settled law that a petitioner who files a petition invoking the extra ordinary writ jurisdiction has to come to Court with clean hand. Further, a petitioner who seeks equity must do equity. In commercial/appellate jurisdiction, a Court […]
