Chhattisgarh HC directs GST Intelligence to avoid coercive action against a taxpayer in a fake ITC investigation, provided the taxpayer cooperates with the inquiry.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that order passed without affording opportunity of personal hearing is against the principle of natural justice. Further, the said order was also not served. Thus, order is set aside and matter restored back.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that assessee is barred from raising objection regarding jurisdiction after one month of service of notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. Accordingly, ITAT absolutely justified in not entertaining jurisdictional question.
Chhattisgarh High Court set aside a GST demand of Rs 5 Cr, ruling the amount violated Section 75(7) of the GST Act by exceeding the SCN’s stated liability.
The amendment to Explanation 1(d) of Rule 43 of the CGST Rules, 2017, effected vide Notification No. 14/2022 – Central Tax dated 05.07.2022, was prospective in nature, therefore, any claim for ITC made in respect of periods antecedent to the notification could not be sustained.
The Chhattisgarh High Court dismissed a review petition filed by Kunal BSBK Joint Venture seeking GST reimbursement from the Chhattisgarh Housing Board, holding that the petition lacked an error apparent on the record and was an attempt to re-argue the contractual dispute.
Chhattisgarh High Court upheld the recovery of GST dues from Shivam Metallurgicals’ Electronic Credit Ledger (ECRL) under Section 79(1)(a) after the assessee failed to pay the demand within the stipulated time.
Chhattisgarh High Court held that addition on account of unaccounted sales based on estimated production yield in complete absence of any adverse material is rightly deleted. Accordingly, substantial question is answered in favour of assessee.
The Court allowed bail to an accused arrested for allegedly availing fraudulent input tax credit, noting prolonged custody since April 2025 and pending trial.
High Court set aside the ineligibility of a candidate for a driver post, holding that the experience certificate from a pre-registered Rice Mill was valid despite later DIC registration. The petitioner’s candidature must be considered.
