Piyush Kumar Anchal Vs State of C.G. (Chhattisgarh High Court) here is serious dispute between the parties, whether the petitioner’s mother is first wife of the deceased Government servant late Shri Mohan Lal Anchal or the mother of Suresh Kumar Anchal, who also claimed compassionate appointment being another son of late Shri Mohan Lal Anchal from […]
Search and seizure proceedings and subsequent summons by DRI quashed by Chhatisgarh High Court being unauthorised. DRI fielded ASG but that did not help. A jeweller’s premises were searched in May-2021, gold and silver was seized. He was arrested and remained in JC for 60 days.
ince the plaintiff and defendants are coparcener of the joint Hindu as per Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005, the daughters are also entitled for getting equal share in the property inherited by their parents. The suit land is inherited by deceased Kachra Bai, as such defendants and plaintiff are entitled to get equal share in the property as per Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act as amended in 2005.
Ravindra Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh (Chhattisgarh high Court) The general rule of criminal justice is that ‘a crime never dies’. The principle is reflected in the well-known maxim nullum tempus aut locus occurrit regi (lapse of time is no bar to Crown in proceeding against offenders). The Limitation Act, 1963 does not apply to […]
Paritosh Kumar Siingh Vs Senior Intelligence Officer (Chhattisgarh High Court) Allegations against applicants are that they have committed economic offence causing loss of Rs.258 Crore approximately to the government ex-chequer by forming thirty fake companies. Applicant Nos.1 & 2 got prepared two Adhar Cards and PAN Cards in two different names with same photograph i.e. […]
Rohan Tanna Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) Applicants are arrested for commission of offences punishable under Sections 16 & 132 (1) (b) & (c) of the GST Act. Section 138 of the GST Act deals with compounding of offences. Offence registered against applicants under Section 132 (1) of the GST Act is made […]
Chhattisgarh High Court grants anticipatory bail to Union Bank of India employees in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act case. No custodial interrogation required.
Due to compelling circumstances and because of the technical glitches and difficulties, assessee was not able to file TRAN-1 form, therefore, High Court directed GST Authority to re-open online portal to enable filing of Form TRAN-1 electronically or accept manually.
Refund is also available when the inter-State or intra-State supply made by a taxpayer, is subsequently found by taxpayer himself as intra-State and inter-State respectively, therefore, the matter may be remitted to the concerned appellate authority for the consideration of his claim/application made under sub-rule (1) of Rule 89 of the Rules, 2017
Assessee who alleged of wrongful availment of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the basis of fictitious transactions worth Rs. 258 Crores was not entitled to get default bail as the complaint had been filed within 60 days of their arrest which was within the time prescribed for filing of complaint to entitle or disentitle the accused persons for default bail.
