CESTAT Hyderabad’s ruling on CENVAT credit reversal for a polyester spun yarn manufacturer and the use of Rule 6(3) in central excise regulations.
CESTAT Hyderabad lowers penalty for discrepancies in import declaration due to negligence, in absence of ulterior motive. Detailed analysis of the case.
Read about the CESTAT Hyderabad decision in Shriram Life Insurance vs. Commissioner of Customs case. CESTAT quashes service tax demand, citing Section 73(3) of the Finance Act.
CESTAT Hyderabad orders the refund of service tax demand on P. Ramesh Kumar for foreign exchange payments to Facebook, citing lack of evidence for business purposes. Full order details.
CESTAT Hyderabad reduces the penalty for Sriram Srinivasa Rao, highlighting the case of gross negligence rather than collusion in the Customs Act 1962
CESTAT Hyderabad held that parking charges collected for providing parking space is liable for inclusion in the value of Management, Maintenance or Repair services and accordingly, service tax is payable on the same.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that CENVAT Credit on inputs used for fabrication of capital goods like pollution control equipment, heating furnace, casting machine, coating machine, chimney, rolling machine, reheating machine, control panel, etc. is eligible.
Explore the CESTAT Hyderabad’s ruling in Mentor Graphics India Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Central Tax Hyderabad regarding Cenvat credit eligibility for input services.
CESTAT Hyderabad held that CENVAT Credit in the books of the transferor is duly available to the transferee on account of change of ownership as per Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules.
CESTAT Hyderabad rules that no service tax is applicable on road repair, management, and maintenance services provided to NHAI from 2005-2009.
