It is evident that there was no requirement of NOC from the Drug Controller in respect of export consignment vide Shipping Bill No. 7099329 dt. 16.04.20 16 filed by the appellant for export of drugs to Liberia.
Cipra Enterprises Vs Commissioner Of Customs- (Export) (CESTAT Delhi) Learned Commissioner (Appeals) observed that it is not in dispute that the goods are not of Indian origin and hence, the appellant was not entitled to claim the benefit of MEIS. Thus, the goods were found to be mis-declared as the appellant had declared the goods […]
CESTAT Delhi held that order of revoking the license of the Customs Broker is unreasonable and unjustified as there was no violation of Regulation 10(a), 10(d) and 10(n) of Customs Broker Licensing Regulations, 2018.
CESTAT Delhi with regard to anti-dumping duty on imports provided the relief of modification of the ‘product under consideration’ to ‘Saturated Fatty Alcohol with a carbon chain length of C12, C14, C16 and C18.
CESTAT Delhi held that Commissioner (Appeals) did not have the power to issue the notice under section 73(1) of the Finance Act. Accordingly, order passed thereon deserved to be set aside.
NIIT Limited Vs Commissioner, CGST (CESTAT Delhi) Transitional provision of Section 142(3) of CGST Act provides that every claim of refund filed by the person after the appointed day (30.06.2017) for refund of any amount of Cenvat credit/duty/tax/interest or any other amount paid under the existing law shall be disposed of in accordance with the […]
National Fertilizers Limited Vs Commissioner CGST & Service Tax (CESTAT Delhi) It is not possible to accept the contentions advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant. It is not in dispute that the issues that arose in all the three appeals were identical. It is true that the Department had filed one appeal only […]
CESTAT Delhi held that supply of ISO Tankers on lease/rental basis by foreign suppliers to the appellant would amount to a deemed sale and accordingly reverse charge not applicable on the same under ‘supply of tangible goods for use’.
The main grievance of the appellant, which is an Association of Indian Steel producer in India, is that despite the recommendation made by the designated authority in the final finding pursuant to the sunset review investigation that was initiated for imposition of anti-dumping duty on imports of colour coated/pre-painted flat products of alloy or non-alloy steel originated in or exported from China PR and European Union , the Central Government did not issue a notification for imposition of anti-dumping duty though three months expired from the date of publication of final finding.
Gabriel India Limited Vs Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi) w.e.f. 01.07.2017, the Government of India had introduced GST regime which has replaced earlier Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 with transitional period of 30 days. Accordingly, after 30.07.2017, no assessee is permitted to avail credit in the cenvat credit account. As […]
