A noteworthy ruling from the Calcutta High Court upholds a preliminary report issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Revenue in the case of non-filing of an objection by Jac Olivol Products Private Limited, shedding light on critical nuances of the WBGST Act.
Calcutta High Court allows re-hearing and extension to file objections in a case concerning Section 24 of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transaction Act. The decision provides an opportunity for a more detailed review of the law.
Calcutta High Court asserts that the denial of the opportunity for cross-examination and failure to provide copies of evidence render an order invalid under the Income Tax Act.
In the case of Kothari Credit (India) Limited v. Union of India and others, the petitioner filed a writ petition challenging the impugned order passed under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
In the case of Vikash Marda Vs Union Of India, the Calcutta High Court instructs CIT(A) to expedite pending appeals concerning assessments made under the Black Money Act.
Read the Calcutta High Court’s ruling in Sanpak Business Solutions vs Assistant Commissioner case. Learn about allegations, apology, show-cause notice, and court’s directions.
In a significant ruling, the Calcutta High Court held that a less than a day delay in the expiry of an E-way bill due to reasons beyond control is excusable, setting aside penalties in the case of Ashok Mishra Vs State of West Bengal & Ors.
In S.P. Paper Packaging Pvt Ltd Vs Union of India, the Calcutta High Court rules that the writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked for a second rectification application under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the order is appealable.
Calcutta High Court held that considering the provisions, order passed u/s 148A(d) is within three years and accordingly, Principal CIT (PCIT) and not the Principal Chief CIT (PCCIT) is ‘Specified Authority’ for approval of the same. Thus, AO rightly took approval from Principal CIT.
The Calcutta High Court rejects a writ petition challenging a tax assessment order, reaffirming that a Writ Court does not act as an assessing officer or an appellate authority
