Bombay High Court reviews Shell India’s challenge to the 2016-17 assessment order under Section 144C. Dispute involved Relaxation Act applicability.
Bombay High Court criticizes ITAT for delayed order, sets aside rejection of Otters Club’s rectification plea, citing ITAT Rules violation.
Bombay High Court seeks reasons for delay in IT refund to Kalmar India, directs affidavit from PCIT-6 and warns of accountability for interest burden on state.
Bombay High Court sets aside Section 148-A notice issued to Dilip Powar, ruling it as a change of opinion and beyond the permissible time limit.
Bombay High Court directed release of bank guarantees since claim stood extinguished due to default on part of respondent to lodge their claim with Resolution Professional. Accordingly, interim application stands allowed.
Bombay High Court held that reopening of assessment by AO by merely acting under dictation or on borrowed satisfaction without independent application of mind to materials on record is not justifiable in law. Hence, appeal of revenue liable to be dismissed.
As already held by us, Section 3 (12) of the Tariff Act, as amended, is applicable only after 16th August,2024 and is not applicable to the present case. Accordingly, in the present case, no confiscation could have been imposed.
Bombay HC rules GST not applicable to Goa University’s affiliation, prospectus, migration fees, deeming them non-commercial statutory charges.
Bombay High Court held that demand in respect of the duty drawbacks post approval of resolution plan is liable to be waived off in terms of section 31A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Accordingly, writ stand allowed.
The petitioner filed its return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act on 24 November 2014 which was subsequently revised on two occasions namely on 17 March 2016 and 25 March 2016 which was further modified on 29 November 2016.
