Bombay High Court upheld a ruling requiring a condominium to charge maintenance fees based on apartment size, citing Maharashtra Apartment Ownership Act and condominium’s Deed of Declaration.
Bombay High Court held that the expression ‘a residential house’ in unamended Section 54(1) of the Act includes more than one residential house. Thus, sale proceeds of one residential house used for purchase of multiple residential house qualifies for exemption u/s. 54(1).
The Bombay High Court directs MahaRERA to restore hybrid hearings and create transparent processes, citing a Supreme Court precedent on access to justice.
Bombay High Court sets aside reassessment notices for AY 2017-18, ruling Jurisdictional AO lacks authority to issue them under Faceless Assessment Scheme.
Bombay High Court criticises UIDAI, banks, and tax authorities over five-year delay in addressing Aadhaar-PAN identity fraud against a Mumbai trader.
Bombay High Court held that that the stage which has been contemplated under Section 44(1)(c) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA, 2002] will be after the jurisdictional Court has taken cognizance of the scheduled offences.
Bombay High Court rejects PCIT’s appeal against Pacific Organics, citing ambiguous notice and follows Full Bench ruling in Mohd. Farhan A. Shaikh case.
Bombay High Court sets aside personal liability for One Person Company director in arbitration, upholding asset deposit by the company. Judgment clarifies Section 17 powers.
Bombay High Court held that offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS] can be recognized as scheduled offences under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [PMLA] without a specific amendment of the PMLA Schedule.
Bombay High Court rules no GST law prohibition on transferring Input Tax Credit between amalgamating companies located in different states, enabling seamless credit flow.