A.T.E. Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (Bombay High Court) In this case, admittedly, the payments have been made beyond the due date as prescribed in the relevant Act, under which the aforesaid payments have been made. However, it is also undisputed that the payments have been made before the due date for fling the return of […]
Pr. CIT Vs Vernan Pvt. Trust (Bombay High Court) Whether the Assessee is engaged in the business of buying and selling of shares or is a mere investor, would depend on the range of factors. In the present case, the Tribunal has noted the relevant facts and analyzed such facts in proper perspective. To reiterate, […]
The channel of movement of the fund, the source of the fund, purpose of investment and the ultimate destination of the fund, were all part of the record during the assessment proceedings. There is nothing in the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer to suggest that, such investment is bogus.
CIT Vs Kalpana Hansraj (Bombay High Court) Perusal of sub-section (1) of Section 54 of the Act would show that the exemption would be available to an assesse being an individual or Hindu Undivided Family where the capital gain arises from the transfer of a long-term capital asset, not being a residential house provided the remaining conditions […]
Saurabh Suryakant Mehta Vs ITO (Bombay High Court) In the present case, the Assessing Officer had examined the material collected by the Sales Tax Department, prima facie suggesting that the assessee had indulged into bogus billing activities without actually carrying out the purchase and sale of the commodity. It is on this basis that the […]
Pr. CIT Vs Tops Security Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Section 43B does not contemplate liability to pay service tax before actual receipt of the funds in the account of the assessee. Hence the liability to pay service tax into the Treasury will arise only upon the assessee receiving the funds and not otherwise. Thus the […]
Meghraj Moolchand Burad Vs Directorate General of GST (Intelligence) (Bombay High Court) The learned counsel appearing for the Investigating Agency has produced on record a letter dated 26.11.2018 addressed by Advocate on record of the applicant to the DGGI, Pune informing him that, the present matter was on board before this Court on 24.11.2018 at […]
Section 40(a)(ia) can be applied only when amount sought to be disallowed has been claimed as an expenditure/deduction. In absence of the amount having been claimed as expenditure while determining the income, dis allowance would not be attracted.
Transfer Pricing provisions on shares purchased at value in excess of FMV was not applicable as the same could only be invoked to bring to tax any income arising from an international transaction.
Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited Vs Add. CIT (Bombay High Court) HC held that we do not think that there is any justification for the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 8(1) to threaten the appellant/applicant with any prosecution. Even if such prosecution under section 276C is launched, the same shall not proceed […]
