In the instant case, as mentioned earlier, the amounts received by assessee is nothing but loan / advance from NIPL and assessee is camouflaging the same as a commercial transaction relating to sale of property in order to get over the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act.
Interest payment cannot be permitted to be deducted against the remuneration earned by the assessee. It was submitted that the assessee was a working partner of the firm and the income earned by the assessee has no correlation with the capital contribution made by the assessee.
M/s. Google India Private Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT (ITAT Bangalore); TDS on royalty payments under section 195(2): Applicability of DTAA cannot be determined suo-moto by AO without there being any application
The only issue in the present appeal is whether the respondent- assessee co-operative society is entitled for deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. The respondent- assessee is registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act. According to the respondent- assessee, the primary activity of the assessee is only to provide credit facilities to its members and therefore it is not a co-operative bank.
Outsource Partners International (P.) Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) It was not a case where no exempted income is earned and AO applied rule 8D for as rule 8D of Income Tax Rules takes care of all aspects of interest bearing funds and interest free funds and expenditure incurred in management of portfolios, etc., once […]
In the case of more than one properties are purchased by the assessee, the option is available with the assessee to claim benefit under Section 54 in respect of the residential house purchased for the assessee’s own residence.
ACIT Vs. M/s. Sutures India Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore)- ITAT Slams CIT(A) for violation of Judicial Discipline by taking contradictory view on issue already confirmed on merit by it and CIT (Appeals) have no jurisdiction to take any decision on issue which is already been decided by CIT under Section 263.
A division bench of the Bengaluru ITAT, on Tuesday held that the distribution fee paid by Google India to Google Ireland for use of its Ad words programme is taxable in India as royalty under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
The Bengaluru ITAT, on Wednesday, confirmed the dis allowance of interest expenses claimed on advances received under sub-Lease agreement since there was a defect in the title of the assessee on the subject property.
EADS India (P) Ltd. Vs Dy. CIT (ITAT Bangalore) In case of amalgamation, assessee was required to file the revised Form No. 36 in accordance with rules, to continue its appeal in the name of new entity. In the absence of any amended Form 36/memo of parties, the present appeals were not maintainable. It is […]
