ITAT Bangalore rules on the scope of rectification under Section 154, emphasizing that only clear and obvious mistakes can be corrected, aiding the assessee.
Explore the ITAT Bangalore verdict on how the statutory deadline for filing returns affects eligibility for deductions under Section 80P, highlighting the case of Madhu Souharda Pathina Sahakari Niyamitha vs ITO.
ITAT Bangalore rules in favor of Minority Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. on interest income deduction under section 80P(2)(d) from unlicensed co-op bank investments for AY 2017-18.
ITAT Bangalore held that unless the debt has been written off in the books of accounts of both the assessees, it cannot be said that that cease to exist.
ITAT Bangalore held that in case where AO of the searched person and the other person is the same, there can be one satisfaction note prepared by AO. Preparation of one satisfaction note will satisfy the requirement of section 153C of the Income Tax Act.
The assessee company having its business of builders and property developers, following mercantile system of accounting, filed its return of income on 30.09.2013 disclosing income at Rs.2,86,000/- after claiming deduction of Rs.4,03,40,492/-u/s. 80IB(10) of the Act.
Explore the ITAT Bangalore ruling in Shaon Paul vs. ITO case. Addition under section 69A upheld due to imprudent retention of a sum for a long period. Details here.
Explore the ITAT Bangalore ruling in Sri Kanyakaparameshwari Vividoddesha Sahakara Sangha Niyamita vs. ITO case. AO’s 15% flat rate on ad-hoc basis for cost of funds deleted. Details here.
Explore ITAT Bangalore’s order in Radhakrishna vs ITO. Cash deposits during demonetization deemed business receipts for bar and restaurant. ITAT remands for reconsideration.
Explore the ITAT Bangalore order in Belur Urban Co-operative Bank vs ITO. Learn why reassessment on interest in NPA loans is directed for readjudication. Full text available.
