ITAT Bangalore sets aside CIT(A) order in Section 54 exemption case due to lack of documents. The case is remanded for fresh review.
ITAT Bangalore held that addition under section 69A towards cash deposits during demonetization deleted since cash deposit was made out of earlier withdrawals. Accordingly, appeal allowed and addition deleted.
ITAT Bangalore ruled on the taxability of Transferable Development Rights (TDR) in the case of Smt. Sowmya Sathyan vs. ITO, clarifying its classification under income tax laws.
The TPO, however, was not satisfied with the process of computation of PLI made by the Assessee. Accordingly, the TPO has treated the expenses incurred by the foreign AE as part of the operating expenses.
ITAT Bangalore upholds CIT(A)’s decision, stating that belated filing of Form 10 is a procedural lapse and doesn’t disqualify an institution from tax exemptions under Section 10(23C)(iiiac) and 11(2).
It is also noteworthy that the learned Departmental Representative (DR), during the hearing, did not point out any material differences between the facts of the present case and those of the earlier assessment years.
Bangalore ITAT remands case for reassessment of post-demonetization cash deposits by a bar & restaurant owner, directing AO to verify business income claims.
ITAT Bangalore remands case where order was passed in name of deceased assessee. Case sent back to CIT(A) for fresh adjudication with additional evidence.
ITAT Bangalore remands case concerning cash deposits during demonetization, directing the AO to re-assess the addition u/s 69A after considering CBDT circulars and granting the assessee a fair hearing.
ITAT Bangalore held that penalty under section 271B of the Income Tax Act for delay in uploading audit report set aside as reasonable cause shown and there was only technical breach without any loss to exchequer of the Government.
