In re M/s Maheshwari Stone Supplying Co. (AAR Telangana) Limestone slabs which have undergone the processes of cutting and polishing and which have been worked beyond the stage of the normal quarry products of chapter 25 are correctly classifiable under heading 68.02 of the Customs tariff as per the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System. […]
In re Aditya Birla Retail Limited (AAR Maharashtra) Also Read AAAR Ruling- Use of words Choice / Value / Superior on packing amounts to branding: AAAR Name Aditya Birla is a benchmark in itself and is associated with a certain trust and quality. Now, we see the definition of ‘brand name’ includes a name or […]
The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act] by ACRYMOLD, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions
In re Reliance Infrastructure Limited (AAR Maharashtra) Reliance Infrastructure Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following : 1. Whether reinstatement charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? 2. Whether access charges paid to Municipal Authorities would be liable to GST? Question Whether reinstatement charges paid to Municipal […]
In re M/s. Rashmi Hospitality Services Private Limited (AAR Gujarat) Issue- One of the customer, who is recipient of services, has given the contract for catering services to be provided to the staff and premise for services to be provided for canteen has also been made available to the applicant, which is non Air-conditioned. Whether […]
Once the service being provided by the appellant is covered under ‘outdoor catering’ service in terms of the Notifications issued under the CGST Act, 2017 and the GGST Act, 2017, the category under which the license has been issued to the appellant under the Food Safety and Standards Act would not make any difference on the taxability of the service provided by the appellant. For the same reasons, the provisions of Factories Act, 1948 are also not relevant to determine the nature of service provided by the appellant.
In re M/s. Inox Air Products Pvt. Ltd. (AAR Gujarat) (a) The activity undertaken by the applicant falls under the ‘Job Work’ as defined under Section 2(68) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. (b) The applicant is liable to pay Goods and Services […]
In the instant case the Applicant is involved in providing the services of diagnosis, pre & post counseling, therapy and prevention of diseases by providing tests that are sophisticated and relevant. The medical team of the applicant is involved in the complete cycle and hence they facilitate the diagnosis process and therefore the services provided by the applicant qualify to be health care services.
It was held that that the services provided by the Applicant to overseas universities are not ‘Export of services’ and therefore, taxable as per the GST laws, on the following basis:
The Applicant states that it provides Overseas Education Advisory whereby it promotes the courses of foreign universities among prospective students and wants a ruling on whether the service provided to the Universities abroad is to be considered export within the meaning of Section 2(6) of the Integrated Goods and Services Act
