Applicant has stated that it is absolutely clear that one cannot invoice as terming Edible copra as its edibility is challenged and it is also clear that HS Code 1203 Copra is meant only for Milling copra (refer HSN Explanatory notes) and their commodity falls under HSN Code 08011920 only
The applicant vide their letter dated 26th August 2019 has submitted that they wish to voluntarily and unconditionally withdraw the advance ruling application as the CBIC circular No.107/26/2019-GST dated 18.07.2019 has provided clarity to the ambiguity for which they had sought the Advance Ruling.
In re A.M. Abdul Rahman Rowther & Co (GST AAR Tamilnadu) The issue raised by the applicant is the classification of the product manufactured by them and the applicability of Notification No.01/2017 Comp.Cess (Rate). From the comments furnished by the Commissioner GST 86 Central Excise, Trichy, it is seen that the proceedings in respect of […]
In re M/s Forbes Facility Services Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Punjab) M/s Forbes Facility Services Pvt. Ltd., R.O. B1 /B2, Manathon Innova, Off. Ganpatrao Kadam Marge, Mumbai-13, Regional office SCO No. 49, 3rd Floor, Above Bank of India, Phase-9, Sector 63, SAS Nagar, Punjab hereinafter referred to as ‘applicant’ had submitted an application for advance […]
In re M/s Bharat Electronics Limited. (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether the various systems, sub-systems and onboard spares supplied by the applicant for use in the Warships, Vessels and Submarines meant for Indian Navy and Shipbuilders, attracts 5% GST? Various systems, sub-systems and onboard spares supplied by the applicant for use in the Warships, Vessels and […]
In re Sai Fertilizers Pvt Ltd (GST AAR West Bengal) The Applicant, while exporting’ single super phosphate’, shall pay IGST @ 18% under SI No. 43 of Schedule III of Notification No. 11/2017 – IT (Rate) dated 28/06/2017, as amended from time to time, if it opts for refund in terms of section 16(3)(b) of […]
In re M/s Deputy Conservator of Forests (GST AAR Karnataka) Question 1. a. The applicant states that Karnataka Forest Department, under its sovereign functions, raises ‘plants’ of tree species, plants them in forest, waste & common lands. Over time, with the nurturing and management of the department, these plants grow up to become trees when […]
In re M/s Antrix Corporation Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Leasing of Satellite Transponder which is covered under SAC Code 997319 be charged at 5% GST as per HSN Code 8803 – Parts Goods of Heading 8802 (Satellites)? The service of Leasing of Satellite Transponders, covered under SAC 9973 19, falls under the Entry No.17 […]
In re East Hooghly Agro Plantatron Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR West Bengal) The HDPE fabric coated/covered with LDPE or LLDPE melt, used for manufacturing the tarpaulin, is not textile material classifiable under Heading 5903. Tarpaulin made from such fabrics of the variety the Applicant supplies, therefore, is not tarpaulin made from textile material, and not […]
In re Alligo Agrovet Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Classification of goods and GST rate applicability in the case of goods manufactured by us (list enclosed) ? Answer:- Products namely AUTUS, SJ-NINJ A, SJ-ERASER, OPRAX, TELNAR, VK’s NEMO AND STRESSOUT are classifiable under HSN Code-3808 and liable to GST @18% (SGST CGST 9% […]
