The work carried by the applicant is a Composite supply of work contract involving pre dominantly earth work provided to a Government Entity and thus attract 5% GST
As per the Standard Operating Procedure issued by Law Committee of GST Council on 28.09.2018, if the services received by deductor from deductee are exempt, then there is no requirement for tax deduction under GST.
In re Wihelm Fricke Se (GST AAR Haryana) Q1. Whether the reimbursement of expenses and salary paid by Wilhelm Fricke SE, Germany to the liaison office established in India is considered as supply of services as per Section (7) of the CGST Act, 2017 or under Schedule I of CGST Act, 2017, especially when no […]
In re Jewel Classic Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) 1. Whether catering of food, banquet facilities and combination of both (as per requirement of the customer) in self-owned marriage and party halls by Hotel Jewels (having all rooms below Rs. 7,500/-), Kunjpura Road, Karnal (A unit of Jewel Classic Hotels Pvt Ltd) is covered […]
In re Haryana State Warehousing Corporation (GST AAR Haryana) 1. Whether interest charged for delay in delivery of goods is taxable under Section 9 of CGST Act, 2017 or HGST Act, 2017 or exempt under Section 11 of CGST Act, 2017 or HGST Act, 2017 and What is the HSN Code of the service mentioned […]
In re Hyco Enterprises (GST AAR Haryana) In order to decide the admissibility of the application, the applicant was called upon to appear before this Authority on 25.02.2020 vide memo no. 18 dated 17.02.2020, but neither the applicant appeared before the Authority nor did it seek any adjournment. Since, the Authority for Advance Ruling is […]
In re Haryana Power Generation Corporation Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) 1. Whether coal rejects to be disposed of by way of sale at very nominal price by the power plants of the applicant attracts levy of compensation cess @ Rs. 400/- per MT? Coal rejects to be disposed of by way of sale at very […]
In re Sachdeva Colleges Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) In order to decide the admissibility of the application, the applicant was called upon to appear before this Authority on 09.01.2020 vide memo no. 02 dated 06.01.2020, but none appeared on behalf of the applicant. Thereafter, notice of appearance was sent for 28.01.2020 vide memo no. 13 […]
In re Musashi Auto Parts Pvt. Ltd. (AAR GST Haryana) The purchase and distribution of sweets, dry fruits, coins or silver items for the purpose of business promotion cannot be termed as an activity carried out in the course or furtherance of business by any stretch of imagination. Section 17(5)(h) expressly bars input tax credit […]
In re Jewel Classic Hotels Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana) The applicant has preferred the application for seeking advance ruling on various issues but it has failed to frame any question. Instead of posing any question before the authority, the applicant has given a description of the activities undertaken by it. The applicant was also […]
