Follow Us:

Advance Rulings

GST: ‘Seat adjuster’ cannot be termed as part of seat

July 30, 2020 2352 Views 0 comment Print

In re Shiroki Technico India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) We find that the ‘seat adjuster’ merely helps in the adjustment of the seat i.e. moving it back and forth as per requirement/convenience and merely improves the efficiency and convenience of the seat but does not form a part of the seat. Even while looking […]

GST on commission received for intermediary services’

July 30, 2020 9534 Views 0 comment Print

In re Dharmshil Agencies (GST AAR Gujarat) In this case, the moot point to be decided is as to whether the services provided by the applicant are liable to CGST and SGST or IGST? For this, we first need to know the nature of the transaction carried out by the applicant. As per the submission […]

GST on Railway Parts supplied for supply to Railway

July 30, 2020 11238 Views 0 comment Print

In re Prragathi Steel Castings Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Karnataka) Railway parts such as Couplers, Knuckle, Locks, Toggle, Yoke etc., manufactured and supplied by applicant to buyer Sanrok Enterprises (who in turn supply to Indian Railways after assembly) be classified under HSN 8607 or to be classified under HSN 7325 as other cast articles of […]

AAR Karnataka allows Kothiwale Tobacco to withdraw application

July 30, 2020 873 Views 0 comment Print

In re Kothiwale Tobacco Trading Company (GST AAR Karnataka) 1. M/s Kothiwale Tobacco Trading Company, # 1097, Kothiwale Building, Guruwar Peth, Nipani, Belagavi-591237, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AABFK8679G1ZS, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 86 KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 86 KGST […]

Un-fried Fryums’ classifiable under Tariff head 2106 90 99

July 30, 2020 1014 Views 1 comment Print

In re Piyush Jayantilal Dobaria (Trade Name : Jay Khodiyar Agency) (GST AAR Gujarat) Q. Under which tariff Heading PAPAD of different shapes and sizes  manufactured/   supplied by the applicant would attract CGST and SGST? The product ‘Un-fried Fryums’ manufactured and supplied by applicant is classifiable under Tariff Item 2106 90 99 of the First […]

Eligibility for inputs tax credit on Demo Vehicles

July 23, 2020 2748 Views 0 comment Print

Eligibility for inputs tax credit on Demo Vehicles can not be decided on the basis of their capitalisation, or payment of GST at the time of their sale in the subsequent year.

ITC not available on Demo vehicles purchased for furtherance of business

July 23, 2020 1635 Views 0 comment Print

Khatwani Sales And Services LLP (GST AAR Madhya Pradesh) Applicant is not eligible for Input Fax Credit on Demo vehicles purchased for furtherance of business, in view of barring provisions of clause (a) of sub-section (5) of Section 17 of GST Act, 2017, as they are not covered by any of the exceptions given in […]

GST under RCM on salary to Directors- AAR allowed application withdrawal

July 23, 2020 1539 Views 1 comment Print

In re Man Structurals (P) Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) Whether GST is payable under Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) the salary paid to Directors of the company who is paid salary as per employment contract? We observe that Shri Madhu Sudan Sharma, authorized representative of the applicant, submitted a letter dated 29.06.2020 addressed to this authority […]

GST on Tour Operator services to Main Tour Operator

July 23, 2020 14223 Views 2 comments Print

In re Crown Tours & Travelers (GST AAR Rajasthan) Whether the rate of 5% under heading 9985(i) is applicable on transaction which the Applicant intents to undertake wherein a single invoice is raised in respect of all the services i.e. local transportation services along-with services like sightseeing, tour guide, elephant ride etc., provided by the  […]

NO ITC to Co-Op Society on lift installation charges

July 20, 2020 2085 Views 0 comment Print

In re Las Palmas Co-Op. Housing Society (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling while upholding the ruling given by the Maharastra Advance Ruling Authority held that the Appellant will not be eligible to avail the ITC in respect of the lift installation charges paid to the lift contractor, in terms of […]

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031