Exemption available to ‘supply of farm labour’ services falling under Chapter heading 9986 under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Notification No. 09/2017- Integrated Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017 is not available to supply of manpower services falling under SAC 99851.
Services of pure labour contract supplied by way of construction, erection, commissioning, installation, completion, fitting out, repair, maintenance, renovation, or alteration of a civil structure or any other original works under PMAY is exempted from GST vide Entry 10 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended).
AAR held that Fortified Rice Kernels FRK manufactured and supplied by the applicant is classifiable under HSN 19049090 and attracts GST @ 18% (SGST 9 % + CGST 9 %).
In re Vivo Mobile India Pvt Ltd. (GST Uttar Pradesh) i. Whether the input tax credit is admissible on the basis of original invoices issued by service provider from old GST No. 09AVKPS1666H2Z1. Ans: In view of discussions held above, input tax credit is not admissible to the applicant on the basis of original invoices […]
In re Macro Media Digital Imaging Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR West Bangal) In the present case, the Appellant prints the content provided by the recipient on the base of PVC, paper, etc., where it provides both the printing ink and the base material. There cannot be any doubt that the content that is printed on […]
In re Siemens Limited (GST AAAR West Bengal) Whether mobilization advance for works contract is supply on the date on which it stands credited on the supplier’s account The appellant argued that the lump sum amount was received by them on 24.06.2011 and they have determined the applicability of taxes on the same as per […]
In re Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) i. What is the time of supply in case of ‘Deposit Works’ being executed by the applicant- Whether it is the time of receipt of funds from the client government department or the time when expenditure incurred towards execution of the work is […]
In re Kasturba Health Society (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that the questions by the Appellant are not maintainable in terms of the Clause (a) of section 95 of the CGST Act, 2017, as the transaction with respect to which the Appellant has asked the questions, are not pertaining […]
In re Vinayaka Constructions (GST AAR Andhra Pradesh) In the instance case, the applicant is the supplier of works contract services and the goods and services received by him for construction of immovable property (other than Plant or machinery) are neither owned nor capitalized in his own account, but passed on to the contractee. Hence […]
In re Bajaj Finance Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, hereby, hold that the additional/Penal interest recovered by the Applicant from their customers against the delayed payment of monthly instalments of the loan extended to such customers, would be exempt from GST in terms of Sl. 27 of the Notification No. […]
