In re New Pandian Travels Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) 1. Whether the GST paid on the Motor cars of seating capacity not exceeding 13 (including Driver) leased or rented to customers will be available to it as INPUT TAX CREDIT (ITC) in terms of Section 17(5)(a)(A) of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017? […]
The ambit of Advance Ruling do not provide for answering the questions raised on provisions relating to ‘Tax Collected at Source’ provided under Section 52 of the Act.
AAR held that Applicant cannot seek Advance ruling under GST for supply already made or for Ongoing Supply and for supply undertaken by Merchant Exporter.
In re Coral Coil India Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Whether the supply of Stator Coil by the Applicant to M/s. Coral Manufacturing Works India Private Ltd., will be eligible for the levy of 2.5% CGST in terms of Sl. No. 234 in the notification 1-CTR dated 28 June 2017 and 2.5% SGST in terms […]
In re Pavan Ventures (GST AAR Karnataka) a. The firm supplies food in a day out package along with sports and adventure activities, whether it constitutes mixed supply? If yes, what is the rate of GST? b. If services provided on a day out package along with food, what is the GST rate? Or can […]
In re Smt. Maddi Sumalatha (GST AAR Karnataka) Rate of GST applicable to Areca Leaf Plates Machine pressed, But the Applicant, vide their email dated 29.10.2021, has informed this authority that they wish wish to withdraw their application. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the […]
In re Bank Note Paper Mill India Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Karnataka) a. Applicability of GST on Liquidated damages for delay in supply as penalty (this is in nature of penalty) b. Applicability of GST on Liquidated damages for compensation of extra cost on account of default from the supplier (this is in the nature […]
In re Johnson Lifts Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Karnataka) Whether Sl.No.3(v)(b) of Notification 11/2017-CT(Rate)-6% CGST is available, when- (a) Such building consists of more than one residential unit and falls under the definition of ‘residential complex’ But the Applicant, vide their letter dated 26.08.2021, informed this authority that they withdraw their application, filed for advance […]
Applicant has not discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- each under any of the CGST/KGST Act 2017 and hence the instant application is liable for rejction under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017. The application filed by the Applicant for advane ruling is hereby rejected for the reasons mentioned above.
The Applicant, vide their letter dated 16.08.2021, has informed this authority that they wish to withdraw their application. Further the applicant has to discharge fee of Rs.5,000/- each in terms of Section 97(1) of the CGST Act 2017 as well as KGST Act 2017, whereas the applicant has discharged the fee of Rs.5,000/- only under KGST Act 2017 and hence the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of CGST Act 2017.
