The supply of applicant of Kandi ravo’ is classifiable under 24013000. The applicant is liable to pay GST at 28% [14 % CGST and 14 % SGST] in terms of notification No. 1/2017-CT(Rate), Sr. No. 13 of Schedule IV subject to the condition that goods are cleared without brand name.
Explore the classification and exemption of Data Projectors (ZH 350, ZW350e, ZX 350e) in the CAAR Mumbai ruling. Understand the intricacies and pending matters.
Explore the Customs Authority ruling on ULDs by Pridel Private Limited in Mumbai. Learn about the exemption from Customs duty, clearance procedures, and the complexities involved in ULDs’ temporary import and re-export.
Explore the case of Comsat Systems Pvt. Ltd. seeking an advance ruling on the place of supply for antenna services. AAR’s rejection highlights GST framework limitations.
Explore the CAAR Delhi ruling on the classification of Optoma Creative Touch 3-Series Interactive Flat Panel (IFP) under Customs Tariff Act, 1975, Sub-heading 84714190.
Explore the Customs Authority of Advance Ruling (CAAR Delhi) decision on the re-import of goods from SEZ/FTWZ, analyzing the implications under Notification No. 45/2017-Cus.
Understand the GST implications on transferring monetary proceeds from IVL India to IVL Sweden, as elucidated by GST AAAR Maharashtra.
AAAR held that transaction between two GSTINs of same person would be considered as lease transaction and accordingly taxable as supply of services in terms of Section 7 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017
AAAR held that, the assessee providing works contract services to Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam, a government authority, would be liable to pay GST @ 18%.
Understand the recent AAR ruling’s impact on GST for education and training services provided to commercial pilots seeking ATR extension. Dive into the detailed analysis of qualification recognition and its consequences.
