Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re CAE Simulation Training Private Limited (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling Order No. 07/AAAR
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/05/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re CAE Simulation Training Private Limited (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh)

Introduction: In the realm of Goods and Services Tax (GST), the treatment of education and training services remains a subject of scrutiny. This article delves into the intricate details of a recent Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) decision concerning GST implications on education and training services provided to commercial pilots aiming for Aircraft Type Rating (ATR) extensions. We explore the case of CAE Simulation Training Private Limited in Uttar Pradesh, unravel the AAR’s verdict, and assess the profound implications it holds for the aviation training sector.

Analysis: The case at hand revolves around CAE Simulation Training Private Limited, a notable player in commercial pilot training. The company specializes in offering Type Rating Training on flight simulators, a critical step for pilots seeking to extend their Aircraft Type Ratings (ATRs). The AAR meticulously reviewed CAE’s submissions, dissected the nuances of qualification recognition, and evaluated whether these services qualified for GST exemption under entry number 66(a) of Notification 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate).

The crux of the matter hinged on whether the training imparted by CAE constituted an integral part of a curriculum leading to a recognized qualification. The AAR dissected the meaning of “qualification recognized by law” and scrutinized whether the training program fulfilled the criteria. The AAR concluded that CAE’s training services did not equate to a recognized qualification since they did not directly culminate in employment or self-employment opportunities. While CAE’s course completion certificates were necessary for applying for Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) examinations, they didn’t confer statutory recognition.

A pivotal aspect of this case lay in differentiating it from a prior ruling involving aircraft engineering training. In that instance, the educational institution was empowered to conduct examinations and certifications. However, CAE Simulation Training’s services, albeit valuable, were more preparatory in nature rather than conferring a recognized qualification.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031