In re Siddhartha Constructions (GST AAR Telangana) AAR held that works contract executed by the applicant for construction of Administrative building for TSIIC falls under Sr No. 3(vi) of Notification No. 11/2017-CT (Rate) as amended till date and therefore taxable at the rate of 6% under CGST & SGST each. However for works executed from […]
In re Cosmic CRF Limited (GST AAR West Bengal) In terms of clause (a) of section 95 of the GST Act, an advance ruling means a decision provided by this Authority or the Appellate Authority, as the case may be, on matters or on questions specified in sub-section (2) of section 97 or sub-section (1) […]
In re Lagom Labs Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Q. Whether the Cramp comfort patch are to be classified under Chapter Heading 3004 attracting 12% GST under serial no. 63 or Chapter Heading 3005 attracting 12% GST under serial no. 64 in Schedule II of Notification 01/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 June 2017 […]
Q2. Whether GST leviable on supply of materials and labour charges incurred during the warranty period, free of cost? A2. Supply of materials and labour while rendering warranty services during the warranty period, free of cost, does not attract GST
In re Spacelance Office Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Tamilnadu) Can GST registrations be allowed for multiple companies from same address, provided they follow all GST rules related to ‘Principle Place of Business’? An applicant can seek an Advance Ruling only in relation to supply of goods or services or both undertaken or proposed to […]
In re A. Nirmala (GST AAR Tamilnadu) AAAR held that if a recipient obtains a ruling on the value to be adopted of his inward supply of goods or services, the supplier of such goods or services is not bound by that ruling and he is free to assess the supply according to his own […]
In re Arvinder Singh Bhatia, Shree Jeet Transport (GST AAAR Chhattisgarh) Whether diesel filled free of cost by the service recipient in the engaged chartered (dedicated) vehicles, would form part of value of supply of service charged by the Appellant and whether GST would be leviable on value of diesel filled free of cost by […]
In re Vinayak Buildcon (GST AAAR Rajasthan) It was held that AAR has rightly rejected the application seeking advance ruling as the question posted by the appellant is related to supplies undertaken by them prior to the date of filing of the application. Read AAR Order:- Advance ruling cannot be given on supply already undertaken […]
The provisions of Section 103 states that the ruling pronounced is binding only on the applicant. It is amply clears that if a recipient of supply obtains a ruling on the taxability of his inward supply of goods or services or both, the supplier of such goods or services or both is not bound by that ruling and he is free to assess the supply according to his own determination/understanding of law and hence ruling loses its relevance and applicability.
In re Smt. Rama Devi Guttikonda (GST AAR Telangana) AAR held that Obesity is not a disease and hence reduction of weight cannot be seen as a treatment against a disease. Therefore The pharmaceutical Pellets and Granules except Orlistat pellet manufactured by the applicant can be classified as medicaments under Sl. No.62 of Schedule II […]
