Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Sales Tax (Andhra Pradesh High Court) A perusal of material on record would show that GST refund application came to be made by the petitioner was on 22.09.2021, for the Tax period May, 2018 to May, 2019. Though, learned Government Pleader would contend that the said […]
Assessee bank was jointly and severally liable for payment of the amount of gratuity to the employee alongwith the existing employer as per the provisions of Payment of Gratuity Act
The controversy revolves around the word ‘derived’ and the word ‘industrial undertaking’. The question is whether the interest paid on delayed payments form part of profits and gains derived from an industrial undertaking?
Inspection/Search by Assistant Commissioner (ST) is valid on basis of authorization by Chief Commissioner under section 2(91) of the GST Act
Navya Foods (P.) Ltd. Vs Superintendent of Central Tax (Andhra Pradesh High Court) A perusal of Rule 107 & 108 of the CGST Rules make it clear that the appeal is required to be filed in an electronic mode only and if any other mode is prescribed, then, the same is required to be notified […]
Foods and Inns Ltd Vs Union of India (Andhra Pradesh High Court) The question that arises for consideration in the present writ petition is: Whether the authorities were right in charging GST, in respect of ‘Mango Pulp’, @ 18%? It is to be noted here that on an application made by the petitioner before the […]
HC directs exclusion of period from 1st March 2020 to 28th February 2022, for limitation period computation for filing GST refund application
HC Held that already sanctioned GST refund not released due to technical glitches in the GST portal. Court directed the department to deal with the refund claim and, if eligible, pay back the refund claim with interest
Held that section 18 of MSMED Act and section 7 of A&C Act clarifies that dispute can be referred to Facilitation Council for conciliation and subsequent arbitration if required. Thus, arbitration clause in agreement would not bar reference of dispute to the Facilitation council
If authority intend to add interest and penalty on amount fixed in SCN, separate notices ought to have been issued to for the said demand
