Umesh Kumar Vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others (Allahabad High Court) The purpose of inserting the provision under Rule 23 of GST Rules, 2017 as to service of notice upon the assessee is to provide an opportunity to him to move a revocation application so as to save the registration from being cancelled permanently […]
Allahabad High Court held that High Courts order directed quashing of notice and consequential order. However, the outstanding amount on web portal continued for a period of 7 months. It clearly shows act and action of the opposite party is deliberate in nature. Hence, contemnor – opposite parity i.e. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax penalized with fine and simple imprisonment for one week.
Allahabad High Court rejected the bail application as 482 applications filed by other co-accused have already been rejected. Further, the said application is also rejection in absence of merit and substance.
Allahabad High Court held that in absence of a valid marriage, marriage certificate of Arya Samaj is not proof of a valid marriage. Accordingly, mere getting a marriage certificate from Arya Samaj is not proof of a valid marriage.
Allahabad High Court held that costume used in the water park would neither fall within the definition of words ‘instrument’ or ‘contrivance’ hence renting on ‘costumes’ cannot be included in the term ‘payment for admission’ as defined under Section 2(l)(iii) of The Uttar Pradesh Entertainment and Betting Tax Act, 1979 and not subject to entertainment tax.
Appellate authority after referring to provisions of Section 129 held that it is well settled that levy of tax & penalty cannot be based upon presumption
Allahabad High Court decision on tax demand stay for ALM Industries. Assessment dispute, financial position, and legal considerations discussed in detail.
Automark Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Commercial Tax (Allahabad High Court) One of the main planks of the arguments submitted by the revisionist before this Court is that their matter was remitted to the Tribunal for decision afresh in pursuance to which the impugned order has been passed. It has been submitted that […]
Allahabad High Court held that granted the bail in GST evasion case observing that the seriousness of the offences alone is not conclusive of the applicant’s entitlement to bail
Section 129, can be invoked by the department with regard to the goods in transit and the goods can be released only in the event the owner of the goods comes forward for payment of penalty as specified in clause (a) or (b) or (c) of Section 129 (1) of the Act and on payment of the said amount, the intent is to give quietus to the litigation.
