ITO Vs Ajmer Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd (ITAT Jaipur) Exception 10(e) to the aforesaid CBDT Circular relates to cases where addition is based on information received from external sources in the nature of law enforcement agencies such as CBI/ ED/ DRI/ SFIO/ Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI). In the instant case, the assessee has […]
Second revision u/s 263 quashed by ITAT holding not permissible on the same subject matter on which specific direction given by First PCIT have been complied by AO. Doctrine of merger applied.
The issue under consideration is whether the addition on the income from foreign asset earned through the retirement plan mentioned in FA schedule is taxable in India or not?
The issue under consideration is whether the addition made by AO merely based on the statement recorded under section 132(4) of the I.T. Act is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether AOP is liable to tax at MMR if income of its members during relevant year exceeded basic exemption limit?
when a building and plant, machinery or furniture are inseparably let out, then under Income Tax it will be taxable under head of house Property, business or other sources?
The issue under consideration is whether the AO is correct in re-opening of the assessment under section 147 even though the assessee has disclose fully and truly all the material facts during original assessment?
Vrinda Sales P. Ltd Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether CIT(A) is correct in levying penalty under Section 271B for not auditing books of accounts/ furnishing reports of the audit of books of accounts on the due date of filing Income Tax Return (ITR)? ITAT states that, in the instant case, […]
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. Vs Addl. CIT (ITAT Mumbai) The assessing officer disallowed the premium paid on FCCB holding that being capital and contingent. The learned CIT(A) allow relief to the assessee by following the decision of tribunal in earlier years. We have seen that the coordinate bench of Tribunal in assessee’s own case for […]
whether it is lawful to first compute capital gain after doing intra head adjustments and whether the deductions u/s 54F should be allowed from the net income computed after intra head adjustments?
