ITO Vs Manoj Vashudev Wadhwa (ITAT Mumbai) In ACIT v. Vireet Investment (P.) Ltd. 165 ITD 27 (Del) (SB) it is held by the Special Bench of the Tribunal that only those investments are to be considered for computing average value of investment which yielded exempt income during the year. We are of the considered […]
Next Gen Films Private Ltd. Vs ITO (Int. Tax-TDS) (ITAT Mumbai) Regarding commissioning agreement entered into by the assessee (Next Gen Films Private Ltd.) with M/s DBPL, at para 2.12, we reached a conclusion that the contract between the assessee and M/s DBPL (M/s Desi Boyz Production Ltd. ) was primarily on principal-to- principal basis. […]
Chowdry Associates Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) From the entirety of the events, we find that in the assessment year 2014-15, the assessee had made purchases in the middle or last week of June 2013 through M/s Anand Rathi Commodities Ltd. and M/s Philips Commodities Pvt. Ltd. The NSEL failed to fulfill its commitments and ultimately […]
Microsoft Corporation (India) Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether expenditure on account of civil and interior works liable for depreciation at 10% or at 15%? ITAT states that, they have perused the items of the expenditure which has been reproduced by the assessing officer in the assessment order and […]
The issue under consideration is whether Section 41(1) is applicable in case of waiver of liability incurred in respect of purchase of capital asset?
The issue under consideration is whether the assessment order passed by the assessing officer under section 153C is bad in law and void ab-initio?
DCIT Vs DHL Logistics Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether assessee is eligible for Depreciation on Goodwill resulting from acquisition of business unit? ITAT states that the issue as regards the entitlement of the assesses towards claim of depreciation on intangible (i.e goodwill) is squarely covered by the orders of the […]
whether disallowance of the expenses only on the basis that there was reduction in the sharing of the revenue in comparison to the earlier years is justified in law?
The issue under consideration is whether ex parte order passed by CIT(A) because of non attendance of assessee on the date of hearing is justified in law?
I-Exceed Technology Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The provisions of Rule 11UA(2)(b) of the Rules provides that, the Assessee can adopt the fair market value as per the above two methods and the choice of method is that of the Assessee. The Tribunal has followed the judgment of Hon’ble Bombay High Court rendered […]
