ACIT Vs Chinsha Property Pvt Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Since the company was engaged in the business of real estate, property in Tulsiwadi was acquired for redevelopment. Hence, commercial expediency/business purpose assessee had invested ₹.11.25 Crores in the project. Therefore, interest cannot be disallowed. Ld. DR submitted that Assessing Officer disallowed the interest observing that assessee […]
Nama Properties Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) In the decisions relied upon by the learned Counsel for the assessee it was held that the genuineness of the trade payables or creditors has to be examined in the year in which they originate and that unless the liability becomes unenforceable or is written off by the […]
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(Appeals) was justified in denying the benefit of deduction to assessee u/s. 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961?
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in confirming the addition made by AO for non-genuine and bogus purchases by applying profit rate at the rate of 12.5% of the bogus purchases?
Reliance Industries Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) The issue under consideration is whether deletion of addition of sales tax incentive/ subsidy as capital in nature is justified in law? In the present case, the assessee in this case is engaged in the business of oil and gas exploration, refining of crude oil, manufacturing of and […]
The issue under consideration is whether the interest income on FDR’s pledged for security purposes in obtaining the contract business comes within the ambit of business income?
Network Synthetics Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) It is observed that the assessee has discharged its initial onus to prove the identity, genuineness of the transaction and creditworthiness of the parties by filing all these documents. The Tribunal in assessee’s group cases while deleting the additions made u/s. 68 of the Act observed as […]
Ryatara Seva Sahakari Sangha Niyamita Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee did not file an appeal before the first appellate authority within the time limit prescribed, on the bonafide belief that the demand that has arisen on account of disallowance of claim u/s 80P of the I.T.Act would not be enforced and shall be kept […]
The amendment brought about by way of Explanation 2 to section 37 by Finance Act, 2014, was only with effect from 01.04.2015. ITAT held that the amendment in question is not retrospective. Expenditure incurred in CSR in accordance with guidelines issued by the Govt. of India is allowable as a deduction for both A.Y. 2013-14 and A.Y. 2014-15. In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed.
Provisions of section 263 could be invoked when twin conditions i.e. the assessment order was erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of Revenue were satisfied. Revision under section 263 could not be invoked if assessment order was not prejudicial to the Revenue.
