The issue under consideration is whether the notice issued under section 147 for re-opening of assessment is justified in law? A claim which has been allowed in the original assessment proceedings after examination of the relevant details and facts cannot be amenable to provisions of Section 147/148 of the Act.
The issue under consideration is whether rejecting the benchmarking approach and methodology followed by the Appellant for determining the ALP of the transactions pertaining to purchase of fixed assets by the Appellant to its overseas AEs is justified in law?
Nirja Khatuwala Vs ITO (ITAT Gauhati) I note that the out of total outstanding credits of Rs. 2,23,89,337/-[total number of sundry creditors were eleven (11)], the Assessing Officer was not satisfied about the genuinity in respect of credit worth Rs. 34,35,509/- i.e. only in respect of three sundry creditors which comes to 16% of total […]
Harendra Singh Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) CIT(A) while deleting the sole foundational issue on which the re-assessment proceedings were initiated, cannot go further and examine an issue which was not even the subject matter of re-assessment proceedings Since the reopening was to verify the purchase transaction and since the said transaction never took place and, […]
DCIT Vs GE BE Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Bangalore) Conclusion: Education cess is not tax and thus not disallowable under section 40(a)(ii). Held: Assessee-company was engaged in the business of contract manufacturing of components and parts of medical diagnostic imaging equipment and also engaged in provision of engineering design services to its affiliate worldwide. Assessee had […]
Rajesh Bajaj Vs DCIT (ITAT Allahabad) The ld. counsel for the assessee has contended that Alka Bajaj and Preeti Bajaj are sister-in-law of the assessee and therefore do not fall in the definition of relative as provided u/s 2(41). This fact is not disputed by the Revenue and therefore, the payment to these two persons […]
The issue under consideration is whether the CIT(A) is correct in upholding the action of the Assessing Officer in making a disallowance under section 36(l)(ii) of the Act; being bonus paid to the Directors of the Company by holding that such payments are in lieu of dividend or profits?
DCIT Vs Zorawar Vanaspati Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the cross objection filed by the revenue regarding levying penalty u/s 234A and 234B of the Act on returned income is justified in law? ITAT states that as far as Revenue’s appeal is concerned, an undisputed fact that the Revenue’s appeal is […]
The issue under consideration is whether the ld. CIT(A) was justified in upholding the disallowance made on account of unverifiable purchases? Appel Against Revisionary Order u/s 263 should be Filed Before Tribunal: ITAT Mumbai
Eminent Computers Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The issue under consideration is whether the re-opening of assessment u/s 147 merely relying upon investigation report is justified in law? ITAT states that the return of income filed by the assessee has also been analyzed with reference to the information received from the Investigation Wing and […]
