Vinko Auto Industries Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Amritsar) Now, coming to the second aspect/determination made by the CIT(A) to the effect that the amendment made in Section 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act by Finance Act 2021 has to be considered as clarificatory in nature and having retrospective effects, therefore would be applicable to the […]
Express Roadway P. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) The issue in the present ground is with respect to addition made on account of delayed payment of ESI/EPF. We find that CIT(A) while deciding the issue in favour of the assessee has given a finding that though there was delay in deposit of ESI & EPF […]
Elsevier Information Systems GMBH Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) t issue which arises for consideration is, whether the subscription fee can be treated as fees for technical services. As discussed earlier, it is evident that the assessee has collated data from various journals and articles and put them in a structured manner in the database to […]
Vansh Jain Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Since in the instant case the assessee admittedly has deposited the employees’ contribution to PF & ESI before the due date of filing of the income tax return, therefore, respectfully following the decisions cited (supra), I hold that the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in sustaining the adjustment made […]
Rukmini Polytubes Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT find the adjustment of Rs. 1,82,543/- under section 43B(b) was made by the CPC on account of belated payment of PF and ESI payment of Bonus and GST. It is the submission of the Learned Counsel for the Assessee that the above payments were made before […]
Worldwide Facility Management Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) Since in the instant case the assessee admittedly has deposited the employees’ contribution to PF & ESI before the due date of filing of the income tax return, therefore, respectfully following the decisions cited (supra), I hold that the Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in […]
Aroon Facilitation Management Services Pvt. Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) I find the A.O. CPC in the instant case has computed the income of the assessee at Rs.16,58,230/- as against the returned income of Rs.6,98,610/- by making an adjustment for a sum of Rs.9,59,624/- on account of belated payment to employees’ contribution towards PF & ESI […]
The assessee classified such cost incurred and right to receive annuity on the toll road as an intangible asset eligible for depreciation u/s.32(1)(ii) of the Act.
Moonfrog Labs Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Ld.CIT(A) held that the advertisement expenses paid to Facebook and other entities constitutes use of industrial, commercial or scientific equipment under section 9(1)(vi) of the Act whether active or passive and hence ‘Royalty’ under the Act. As regards taxability as ‘“Fees for technical services’, it was […]
ITAT Delhi rules in Amandeep Singh Khurana vs ITO, disallowance u/s 36(1)(va) not valid for delayed PF/ESI deposit if made before return filing.
