Abdul Wahab Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The specific words which arouse ITATs concern are the allegation that the CIT(A) order under challenge is alleged to have been passed in routine, arbitrary and whimsical manner having no sustainability in law. On-going through the record in the specific case ITAT find that none of the above allegations […]
ThoughtWorks Technologies (India) Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) As per clause 4 of the agreement between the assessee and the First Leasing (lessor) the asset shall remain the exclusive property of the lessor (First Leasing) at all times. It further provides that the lessee at no time during the lease period can capitalize the […]
ITAT hold that the amendment to section 36(1)(va) and 43B of the Act will not have application for the relevant assessment year, namely assessment year 2018-2019.
ITAT hold that the provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to a banking company i.e. the assessee herein also. Having held that the provisions of sec.115JB are not applicable to the assessee, we are of the opinion that grounds No.19 to 22 need no adjudication at this stage.
Addl. CIT Vs G.S. Pharmbutor P. Ltd. (ITAT Delhi) It is undisputed fact that the assessee has not given any loan or advances during the year. As can be seen from the copy of account of M/s. Moderate Leasing & Capital Services Limited, assessee has been paying advances and loan to the said company from […]
LG Soft India Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The Hon’ble Bombay High Court in the case of Sesa Goa Limited v. JCIT (supra) had held education cess is an allowable expenditure as the word ‘cess’ is conspicuously absent under the provisions of section 40(a)(ii) of the I.T.Act The Hon’ble High Court also placed reliance […]
Jaydeep J. Patel (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) ITAT Ahmedabad Bench in an identical case where revisionary powers were exercised for directing detailed inquiry on agricultural expenses incurred, held that where the AO had accepted agricultural income after conducting due inquiries no revision u/s 263 can be done and that it tantamount to mere change […]
M. K. Kempasiddaiah Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) Since no documentary evidence was filed, the AO treated the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was unexplained investment which the CIT(A) confirmed. It is the plea of the assessee that the assessee is a 80 years old person and his savings to the extent of Rs.2,50,000/- cannot be doubted. After […]
Neilsoft Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune) This appeal by the assessee is directed against the final assessment order dated 13-04-2021 passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) in relation to the assessment year 2016-17. 2. The only […]
Mamatha Divakar Shetty Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) In the statement of LTCG, the assessee had not adopted the market value/SRO value as sale consideration as per section 50C of the Act. In AY 2012-13, the assessee computed LTCG by adopting market value of Rs. 9,44,98,000/- and the assessee being 1/4th share beneficiary of Rs. 2,09,62,515/-, […]
