Case Law Details
Case Name : M. K. Kempasiddaiah Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 008-09 to 2011-12 and 2013-1
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Bangalore
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
M. K. Kempasiddaiah Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Since no documentary evidence was filed, the AO treated the sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was unexplained investment which the CIT(A) confirmed. It is the plea of the assessee that the assessee is a 80 years old person and his savings to the extent of Rs.2,50,000/- cannot be doubted. After considering rival submissions, I am of the view that the plea of the assessee in this regard has to be accepted. Admittedly, the fixed deposit in question was issued on 02.06.2010 and matured for payment on 02.06.2012. Considering t
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.