GRI Renewable Industries S.L. Vs ACIT (IT) (ITAT Pune) It is seen that the assessee offered its income from ‘royalties’ and ‘fees for technical services’ on gross basis, albeit at the concessional rate of tax. The assessee claimed that a sum of Rs.35.67 lakh was received as reimbursement of expenses which was not liable to […]
Vatsal Navnitlal Parikh Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad) We find that additional evidences are produced for the first time before the Tribunal. These documents were not filed before the lower authorities during assessment proceedings due to family disputes. Therefore, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to remand the matter back to the file […]
Section 10(38) exempts only a stream of capital gain from tax and not the entire source. So if the assessee incurs loss in sale of equity shares, the gain from sale of which is exempt under section 10(38), then such loss will be allowed to be set off against long-term capital gain from sale of shares as well from sale of other assets.
Vishnu Kumar Garg Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) We find the A.O. in the instant case made an addition of Rs.12 lakhs to the total income of the assessee under section 69A of the I.T. Act, 1961 on the basis of entries dated 07.07.2010 and 07.08.2010 found as per Page-14 of Annexure-A1. We find the Ld. […]
ITO Vs Sandeep S. Dagaria (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT notices that Assessing Officer has merely proceeded to make addition of Rs.7,00,000/- unsecured loans merely because the Rajat Group of Companies involved in the transaction of bogus purchases and rejected the evidences submitted before him i.e. assessee has submitted the confirmation balance and the transactions were only […]
Dr. Mumtaz Ali Khan Afzal Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad) From the facts of the case it appears that the assessee did not properly co-operate before the Ld. AO. However, considering the explanation rendered by the Ld. AR regarding the hardship faced by the assessee and since the assessee is a senior citizen, we […]
Explore the ITAT Indore’s order on unexplained investment and undisclosed expenditure. Assess the impact of legal nuances on tax implications.
Murlidhar Hassani Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) In the instant case, admittedly and undisputedly, the employees’ contribution to ESI and PF collected by the assessee from its employees have been deposited well before the due date of filing of return of income u/s 139(1) of the Act. Further, the ld D/R has referred to the explanation […]
To the extent of the interest earned from investments made by it with any co-operative society, a co-operative society is entitled to deduction of the whole of such income under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. However, interest earned from investments made in any bank, not being a co-operative society, is not deductible under section 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
Vanderlande Industries Private Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Pune) A cursory glance at the definition of the term `Royalties’ makes it patent that the hitherto content of para 4 of Article 12 comprising of copyright royalty cases only became subject matter of sub-para (a) of the amended para 4 of Article 12. In addition, para 4(b) […]
