Mathew Pradeep Francis Vs ACIT (ITAT Bangalore) In the instant case, we noticed that the assessee has made investment in acquiring new residential house property within the time given in section 54 of the Act and also within the time limit prescribed u/s 139(4) for filing revised return of income. Accordingly, following the binding decision […]
ACIT Vs Byramjee Jeejeebhoy Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Mumbai) Revenue is aggrieved with the observation of the CIT(A) that the provisions of Sec. 50C of the Act would not stand triggered in respect of the transaction of transfer of reversionary rights of the property in question by the assessee to M/s Yash & Yashika Mercantile (P) […]
Y. Manjula Reddy Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) The next impediment in the minds of the tax authorities was that the plot was purchased jointly in the name of the assessee and her husband and hence it should be held that both held 50% right each and hence the assessee could have purchased only her husband’s […]
Kalpesh Synthetics Pvt Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Grievance of the assessee, as requiring our adjudication in this appeal, is that the learned CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the adjustment, made by the Centralized Processing Centre Bengaluru while processing income tax returns under section 143(1) based on certain inputs from the tax audit reports […]
A.O. had rightly endorsed the corroborated claim of the assessee in this regard, the PCIT, in our view, has attempted to substitute his wisdom by views of the A.O. without any definite basis. If the view of the PCIT towards the banakhat allegedly hollow or unenforceable is accepted, no income can be recognised at all.
Saifee Burhani Upliftment Trust Vs CIT (Exemptions) (ITAT Mumbai) In the present case, it has not been disputed that the assessee trust was duly registered under section 12AA of the Act. Thus, the only provision applicable to the assessee trust for the purpose of applying for registration is section 12A(1)(ac)(i) of the Act. Further, section […]
Plutus Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) We find the Assessing Officer in the instant case made addition of Rs.1,36,39,191/- u/s 68 of the Act in respect of unsecured loan obtained by the assessee from three directors on the ground that the assessee failed to substantiate with evidences to his satisfaction regarding creditworthiness of […]
Neelkamal Realtors Suburban Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT find that identical issue has been decided by the co-ordinate Bench in case of Emdee Digitronics Pvt. Ltd Vs. PCIT in ITA No. 361/Kol/2019 dated 28th June, 2019, wherein the co-ordinate Bench in Para No.12 relying on the decision of M/s Naaraayani Sons Pvt. Limited, […]
DCIT Vs. Bhagyalaxmi Rolling Mill Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Pune) The issue for adjudication in all these appeals is the assessee having received subsidy from Government of Maharashtra under Package Scheme of Incentives of 2007 (PSI-2007), Whether the said subsidy is capital receipt or a revenue receipt. The assessee-company had set up a mega project as […]
Balex Private Ltd. Vs ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) Ld. AR further submitted during the set-aside assessment proceeding the address to where notices alleged to have been served remained vacant and therefore, the assessee could not reply to the notices issued by the AO. The assessee came to know about the issuance of notice when the Authorised […]
