ITAT Ahmedabad held that an appellate authority can exercise the power u/s. 251(1)(a) to enhance the assessment only after giving a notice for enhancement. Accordingly, enhancement by CIT(A) without issuance of notice is untenable in law.
In a case of Suprinit Tradinvest Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO, ITAT Ahmedabad directs AO not to disallow business loss in share transactions without thorough document verification.
ITAT Bangalore upholds disallowance of belated ESI & Provident Fund payments in Balmatta Diagnostic & Research Centre case. Portal glitches lead to delay, but disallowance confirmed.
ITAT Mumbai upholds reassessment proceedings in Himanshu Manoranjan Bhatt vs ITO case. Sale and purchase of property not disclosed; addition of LTCG contested.
Explore ITAT Mumbai’s order on sundry creditors from bogus purchases. Learn about tax implications, sections 68 and 41(1), and the importance of accepted transactions.
Read the detailed analysis of Vijapurapu Sudha Rao vs ITO case by ITAT Visakhapatnam. No penalty under section 271D for cash sale if promptly deposited in the bank.
ITAT Pune orders re-adjudication in Mahesh Shikshan Sanstha Vs CIT case. Failure to respond to notice under IT Rules 17A(2). Detailed analysis and implications.
ITAT Delhi held that disallowance of purchases by treating it as bogus unjustified as the impugned purchases have been sold and the sales have been accepted as there cannot be any sale without purchases.
ITAT Chennai held that there is no violation of provisions of section 269SS when all sale deeds were registered and cash payment was made at one go before the sub-registrar at the time of registration of sale deeds of plots. Hence, penalty u/s 271D not leviable.
ITAT Delhi held that simultaneous issue of the DIN number is insignificant and superfluous exercise, in the absence of mentioning the DIN number on the body of AO’s order. Thus, Assessment order without DIN is void ab initio.
