Ritlal Rai Vs. Union of India (Patna High Court) In this case Though the petitioner has already suffered maximum punishment of seven years, so in the present case lodged under the PML Act, he cannot be kept in judicial custody but, because in two cases in which he is still in jail with respect to […]
The issue under consideration is whether RTI application seeking disclosure of Minutes of the Board Meeting & resolutions of Goods & Service Tax Network (GSTN) by information commissioner will be sustain in law?
Pending the confiscation proceedings, if the writ applicants file an application under Section 67(6) of the Act for provisional release of the goods and the vehicle, if any, then the competent authority shall look into the same at the earliest and pass an appropriate order on such application within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of such application.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Vs Commissioner CGST & Central Excise (Bombay High Court) Taking into consideration, the facts of the case, though the officers under the CGST Act, cannot seek custody of the arrested persons for completing the investigation, respondent’s contention that applicant’s detention in custody is necessary to prevent him from causing the evidence of […]
Vivaa Tradecom Pvt. Ltd. Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) The Gujarat High Court quashed the order and the demand notice passed by the respondent authority because of the procedural lapses and remitting the matter back to the respondent authority for fresh hearing. The first writ applicant, M/s Viva Tradecom Pvt. Ltd is a […]
The issue under consideration is whether the order passed by AO by denying the cross examination request of custom banker as well as bank officials is justified in law?
High Court restricted the Central Government from appointing technical members to the Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunals (GSTAT) until further orders.
whether the serving of assessment order by uploading it on web portal and not communicated separately to the assessee will be considered as valid under law?
whether Tribunal is right in holding that amendment made to Section 40(a)(ia) by Finance Act, 2010 would apply retrospectively though the amendment is made with effect from 01.4.2010?
Punjab National Bank Vs. Mithilanchal Industries Pvt. Ltd. (Gujarat High Court) In the present case, the borrower took an objection of non-compliance of sub-section (3), in his objection / representation given sub-section (3A), but despite the same the Bank – Secured Creditor in the present case rejected the objection instead of ensuring the compliance of […]
